Reference no: EM132347832
This final writing assignment allows you to present an analysis of the best reasoning on each side of your issue. In the process, you will get to demonstrate some of the key skills you have learned during this course. In particular, you will demonstrate the ability to create high-quality arguments on both sides of an issue, to support your reasoning with scholarly sources, and to provide a fair analysis of the strength of the reasoning on each side. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week Five ExamplePreview the document paper.
Your paper must include the following sections, clearly labeled:
Introduction
Introduce readers to your topic; include a brief preview of what you will accomplish in this paper. (approximately 150 words)
First Argument
Present the best argument on one side of the issue. (approximately 150 words)
Express your argument in standard form, with the premises listed one by one above the conclusion.
Defense for First Argument
Support the first argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You may also choose to clarify the meaning of key premises and to explain how your reasoning supports the conclusion (approximately 250 words).
Opposing Argument
Present the best argument on the other side of the issue (approximately 150 words).
Express your argument in standard form.
Defense of Opposing Argument
Support the opposing argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You are welcome as well to clarify the meaning of premises and/or to explain the reasoning further (approximately 250 words).
Analysis of the Reasoning (approximately 350 words)
Evaluate the quality of each argument, addressing whether key premises are true and whether the conclusion logically follows from them.
Analyze arguments for any fallacies committed or for any biases that may influence either side. Do you feel that one argument makes a much stronger case than the other and why? (There is no need to "take sides," only to assess the quality of the arguments.)
Support your analysis with scholarly sources.
Conclusion (approximately 150 words)
Provide a brief conclusion and summary of your issue and how it can best be addressed by critical thinkers.
Conduct thermodynamic analysis of the Solar Turbines Mercury
: MEEN 315 Principles of Thermodynamics Assignment - Project Task, Texas A&M University, USA. Conduct thermodynamic analysis of the Solar Turbines Mercury
|
What is the price of the stock
: The appropriate discount rate for Pharsalus's stock is 14.6 percent. What is the price of the stock?
|
Yield to maturity on the bond
: Compute the price of a $ 8,602 par value, 17 percent coupon consol, or perpetual bond (i.e., coupon interest payment is a perpetuity)
|
Compute the? firm 2016 net operating income
: The interest rate on the? company's debt is 5.7 ?percent, and its tax rate 35 percent. The operating profit margin is 10 percent.
|
Defense of opposing argument
: Defense of Opposing Argument . Evaluate the quality of each argument, addressing whether key premises are true and whether the conclusion logically
|
Total nominal rate of return on investment
: Suppose you bought a bond with an annual coupon of 7 percent one year ago for $970. The bond sells for $940 today.
|
What is that project provide complete description
: Based on week 13 reading assignment, describe an IT or similar business project you have done or are currently doing. In your discussion, provide information.
|
Compute the price of a par value
: Compute the price of a $1,000 par value, 17 percent (semi-annual payment) coupon bond with 16 years remaining until maturity assuming
|
Constant amortisation on maturity
: On the same loan, is the total amount of interest payable more if the loan is repaid in fixed annual instalments, by constant amortisation or on maturity?
|