Reference no: EM133355107

1- Defenders of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment argue that by preventing participants from accessing penicillin, much was learned about syphilis. Do you believe that the benefits gained from this research outweighed the costs to those men and their families? Why or why not? Is there another way this same information could have been accessed?

Question 3. Rennison - Hart, Chapter 3: Conducting a Literature Review

2. Another student in your class is working on a literature review on sexual violence. He finds some literature in a journal but feels it does not cover the topic well. He decides to include information found in an article published in Playboy magazine because he argues it is a better source for this topic. How would you identify him to proceed? Why would you make that suggestion? (According to the textbook authors, this is based on an actual incident.)

3. You go home to discover someone has broken in and stolen artwork that you have created. Although your artwork may not be worth millions, it is yours and you worked very hard creating it. In addition, it represents a lifetime of labor with art. A few weeks later, you are walking downtown and in a window is your artwork for sale! On the accompanying information sheet, it notes the art was created by someone else (not you). How would this make you feel? Do you believe that plagiarism is the same as type of theft and fraud? Why or why not? What punishment should the art thief receive? How would you punish a plagiarizer, if you had the power and authority to do so?,