Defendant admission made while in the police car

Reference no: EM132731732

Police received a tip that a man has been selling drugs out of his house and that there are several teenagers who work for him as peddlers. Two officers stopped him outside his house and asked if he would accompany them to the station to answer some questions. He agreed to come along.

On the way to the station, the officers pointed to children walking around and mentioned that penalty is heavy for those who sell drugs to children, or involve them in selling drugs. The suspect said, "Hey, I may have dealt some drugs, but I have never sold to kids or dealt with kids."

When they arrived at the station, the officers arrested him and read him his rights, based on the tip they had received initially, and his admission to selling drugs. Then he was taken to a room and confronted with being the center of a drug ring that uses teenagers to distribute drugs. He asked, "Maybe I should call my lawyer?" The officers replied, "Telling us the truth will do much more for you than seeing a lawyer." The man admitted to his involvement and called his lawyer afterward.

1. Assume that you are the judge on this case. What motions to dismiss would you expect to hear from the defense in the case? How would the prosecution counter these motions?

2. What are the key issues arising from the defendant's admission made while in the police car? Is the case within the ambit of Miranda, or outside it? Why do you think so?

3. Should the defendant's admission in the police car be admissible? Why or why not? Discuss with reference to United States v. Patane (2004).

4. What are the key issues surrounding the defendant's admission while at the police station? Explain in detail with reference to the Miranda warnings and the fact that during interrogation the defendant had mentioned, not demanded, a lawyer.

5. Should the admission made at the station be admissible? Why or why not?

6. What would have been the effect on this case if the suspect had not asked for his lawyer? Discuss with reference to Escobedo v. Illinois.

7. What evidence could be added to the scenario to strengthen a defense attorney's motion to dismiss the evidence? What evidence could be added to weaken it?

Reference no: EM132731732

Questions Cloud

Theories of crime and ethical consideration : What is the motivation behind committing criminal acts? How do some people decide to commit a crime? Do they think about the benefits and the risks?

Are there any aspects of inquisitorial system : Are there any aspects of the inquisitorial system that could be brought into the adversarial system to improve it? Explain.

Implemented community policing : Describe how the other country has implemented community policing. Is there any data or evidence to show whether these efforts have been effective?

Compare criminal justice systems : The cases of Amanda Knox and Michael Fay offer good opportunities to compare criminal justice systems.

Defendant admission made while in the police car : What are the key issues arising from the defendant's admission made while in the police car? Is the case within the ambit of Miranda, or outside it?

Define the elements of perjury : Define the elements of perjury. What are the commonly encountered issues in a perjury prosecution?

Correctional system : Explain one problem that exists in our correctional system that must be addressed.

Key ingredient of doctoral success : Being able to plan a path to success is a key ingredient of doctoral success.

Civil liability-tort liability and vicarious liability : Explain the differences between general civil liability, tort liability, and vicarious liability, to include the potential civil and criminal ramifications

User Account

All Pages