Reference no: EM133223490

In analyzing the Medford University case utilizing decision management and decision control why would allocate decision management responsibilities related to cutting back on the university's fringe benefits plan to a committee and not the human resource's staff, (b) whether Hiromi would want to allocate decision rights to the committee or does he want to retain them himself, (c) whether you think that the committee will always make a decision that is in the best interest of the university, and (d) why the president appoint his key assistant and chief administrator to powerful positions on the subcommittee. Try to integrate the following terms into responses: (a) general versus specific knowledge, (b) allocation of decision rights and decision management and control, (c) tradeoffs, (d) the use of teams in decision-making, and (e) agenda control.