Really appreciate your service and like your work because give it time before 1 day with good quality. Expert is too fast to deliver the assignment, so I will give the best rating for the assignment, followed everything as mentioned, what else I need to get good marks. very good

please make sure the expert knows that the question file is in PGDBATopUp-Financial Mgt-AQ.pdf, others are for reference only. OK. Please choose a company listed in Hong Kong. Please use hangseng bank then, https://finance.google.com/finance?q=HKG%3A0011&ei=TeKnWbGQH4eV0ATJ2bzgDw China Communications Construction Company Limited and china railway construction..

I dont think u need to ask for how many years if you have read the questions. For the ratio, at least five per tasks Again please compare Hang Seng Bank against Bank of East Asia, both listed in Hong Kong There should be other ratio that applicable to financial company? Ok if the target company and the comparison company are both listed in Hong Kong and in Construction sector, Properties sector, Trading and Manufacturing sector or Finance sector. the two companies are more considered as infrastructure instead of construction

The Firm, its Business competitors and its industry Background Main Body Summary of the Statement of its Financial Position, Statement of Financial Performance, Shareholders equity statement and Operating cash flow statement for the past two years. Customer Profitability Analysis. The factors that should be considered by the firm on appropriate level of working capital and long term source of finance on its expansion programme.

-question file in PGDBA(TopUp)-Leading Organisation-AQ - Style: Times New Roman & Font Size: 12 . Line Spacing: 1.5 . Page Layout/Orientation: Portrait . All the margins should be set about 25mm on both sides (i.e. left & right) of each page. . Numerical Systems (e.g 1.0, 1.1 and 1.1.1) should be used for each section and subsection. . Word count must be indicated on the cover page of the assignment. . Your word count should not include your reference list. You should provide your word count also at the end of your report. . Exceeding the word count by more than 10% will result in a penalty of 10% of your marks for your work. . If your work is significantly shorter, then you will probably have failed to provide the level of detail required. - at least 15 academic reference, harvard referencing

-question file in PGDBA(TopUp)-Financial Mgt-AQ; other for reference -Choose a Hong Kong listed company in the following sector: Construction sector Properties sector Trading and Manufacturing sector Finance sector - at least 10 academic reference, harvard referencing

Pass 50-59 Showsareasonableunderstandingofthemajorfactual and/or theoretical issues involved. Shows evidence of planning and selection from relevant sources. Demonstrates some knowledge of the relevant literature. Text shows, in places, examples of a clear train of thought or argument. Text is introduced and concludes appropriately. Marginal Fail 40-49 Shows some awareness and understanding of the factual or theoretical issues, but with little development. Misunderstandings are evident. Shows some evidence of planning, although irrelevant/unrelated material orarguments areincluded Poor Failure <40 Fails to answer the assignment question or to develop an argument that relates to the question set. Does not engage with the relevant literature or demonstrate acknowledge of the key issues. Contains clear conceptual or factual errors or misunderstandings.

Assessment Grading Criteria Classification Mark(%) Description Distinction 70-100 Asfor“60-69marks” bandplusthefollowing: Shows clear evidence of wide and relevant reading and an engagement with the conceptual issues. Develops a sophisticated and intelligent argument. Shows a rigorous use and a sophisticated understanding of relevant source materials, balancing appropriately between factual detail and key theoretical issues. Materials are evaluated directly and their assumptions and arguments challenged and/or appraised. Shows original thinking and a willingness to take risks. Commendation 60-69 Shows strong evidence of critical insight and critical thinking. Shows a detailed understanding of the major factual and/or theoretical issues and directly engages with the relevant literature on the question set. Develops a focussed and clear argument and articulates clearly and convincingly with a sustained train of logical thought. Shows clear evidence of planning and appropriate choice of sources and methodology/concepts/models.