Reference no: EM132760606
EUROPE AND INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION
Paper Format:
• The word limit for each answer is 1000 words (± 10%) excluding the reference list. Any text beyond this limit will not be read.
• Answer both questions, and do not change the wording of the sub-questions.
• Formatting: Calibri 12 points, 1,5 spacing, standard margins. Please include page numbers.
• In the header of your document include your full name and the name of the course
INSTRUCTIONS
It is bery important that you make an explicit reference to the course literatur first then you can use other sources
Answer both questions!
Question 1 (max 1000 words ± 10%), excluding reference list.
What does Dumbrava (2018) mean by that we're seeing both a de-nationalization and a re-nationalization of citizenship? Discuss examples of both trends, and argue which trend you think is more prominent.
Course literature
1. Dumbrava C., (2018), ‘The Governance of Citizenship and Belonging in Europe and the European Union'. In Weinar, A., Bonjour, S., and Zhyznomirska, L. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, 1st edition. London: Routledge. Chapter 12.
2. Goodman, S. W., (2018)., ‘The Civic Integration Turn'. In Weinar, A., Bonjour, S., and Zhyznomirska, L. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, 1st edition. London: Routledge. Chapter 14.
3. Anderson, B., (1991), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. Introduction.
4. Torpey, J., (2000), The Invention of the Passport. Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
5. Posen, B. R., (1993), ‘Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power'. International Security Vol. 18(2), 80-124.
6. Ivic, S, (2019), EU Citizenship: Towards a Postmodern Conception of Citizenship. Vernon Press: Wilmington.
Question 2 excluding reference list.
"Brexit could facilitate legal control over the entry and stay of EU citizens, but might paradoxically render control of immigration of third-country nationals, including asylum seekers, more difficult compared to the status quo" (Thym & Wendel, 2019). Describe, discuss and develop an argument.
COURSE LITETRATURE
1- Thym D., Wendel M., (2019), ‘Immigration after Brexit: Ironies and Challenges' in Pernice I., Guerra Martins A. (Eds.), Brexit and the Future of EU Politics, page 185 - 198. Open access at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748903246-185
2- Geddes, A. & Scholten, P. (2016), The politics of migration and immigration in Europe, London: Sage [2nd edition]. (270 pp).
3. Odmalm P., (2018), ‘The Party Politics of Migraiton', pp. 118-125 in Weinar, A., Bonjour, S., and Zhyznomirska, L. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, 1st edition. London: Routledge.