Send me Proposal first and dont start further until I say to proceed further Don't forget to tell the tutor that data should be taken from Oman. firstly need the proposal following is the format. 1- title of the dafa set 2- what delivery and predict ( proposal, report, presentation) 3- which software used ( pspp ) 4- what technique used in analyze 5- task timeline ( same as action plan ) 6- reference ( i will provide u the reference)

Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-6 7-9 Mark Task. 8 Critical Evaluation, Recommend ations & Conclusions Poor discussion of Critical Evaluation, Recommendation and Conclusions. Partial discussion done. Relevant points not properly discussed Satisfactory / Good discussion of Critical Evaluation, Recommendation and Conclusions. However scope of improvement exists Very Good / Excellent compilation of Critical Evaluation, Recommendation and Conclusions. Discussed relevant key points for each aspects. Deliverables Aspects 0 1 2 Mark Task. 9 References Poor References provided. Not followed CU Harvard style. Satisfactory / Good References provided. However scope of improvement exists. Poor References provided. Not followed CU Harvard style.

Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-10 11-15 Mark Task. 6 Proposed BI Framework Poor discussion of BI Framework. Relevant points not discussed / Satisfactory / Good discussion of BI Framework. Components of BI Very Good / Excellent compilation of data BI framework. Discussed relevant flow, process Partial discussion done identified and discussed. However scope of improvement exists and components. Explained necessary framework with usages. Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-6 7-9 Mark Task. 7 Barriers , Challenges, Benefits Poor discussion of Barriers, Challenges and Benefits. Partial discussion done. Relevant points not properly discussed Satisfactory / Good discussion Barriers, Challenges and Benefits. However scope of improvement exists Very Good / Excellent compilation of Barriers, Challenges and Benefits Discussed relevant key points for each aspects.

Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-20 20-25 Task 5 Data Analytics Framework Poor discussion of Data Analytics Framework. Relevant points not discussed / Partial discussion done Satisfactory / Good discussion of Data Analytics Framework. Satisfactory demonstration of different types of hypothesis and tests. However scope of improvement exists Very Good / Excellent compilation of data analytics framework. Very Good / Excellent discussion of different types of hypothesis testing and relevant examples provided. Explained necessary framework with usages.

Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-8 9-10 Task. 3 Existing System Study Poor discussion of existing system Relevant points not discussed Satisfactory / Good discussion of existing system. Few components of discussion can be improved. Very Good / Excellent compilation of existing system Explained complete system. Necessary diagram / illustration provided Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-10 11-15 Task 4 Comparative Study Poor discussion of comparative study Relevant points not discussed / Partial discussion done Satisfactory / Good discussion of comparative study. Few system components of discussion can be improved. Very Good / Excellent compilation of comparative study. Explained systems and components. Necessary table provided

Deliverables Aspects 0-3 4-8 9-10 Task 1 Work Proposal Poor compilation of work proposal. Relevant points not discussed Satisfactory / Good compilation of work proposal. Few components of work proposal not discussed Very Good / Excellent compilation of work proposal reflecting all key components and points Deliverables Aspects 0-1 2-3 4-5 Task 2 Introduction Poor compilation of Introduction. Relevant points not discussed Satisfactory / Good compilation of introduction. Few components of introduction not discussed Very Good / Excellent compilation of introductions. Explained organization / company business introductions

20-29% No learning outcomes fully met. Little evidence of attempts to engage with module materials. 10-19% Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes.In adequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice. 0-9% No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes

60-69 % Good Good understanding of the issues. Engages directly with the question. Clear argumentwith g ood examples used to support it. All main points and important issues of the question/task covered. Some evidence ofreading o utside the module list Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate 50-59% Competent Generally sound understanding of basic theory and concepts. Content relevant to thequestion/task. Competently deals with main issues. Reading based on main texts ormaterials, but not always fully utilised in supporting argument. Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 30- 49% Retrievable fail Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met. Superficial treatment of issues. Some is relevant to topic set. Material merely repeatstaught input. Lacks understanding of basic th eory or concepts. Possible use of extensive quoted passages. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the participant will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission.

Assessment Grading Criteria 90-100% Outstanding Focused and comprehensive engagement with the question, showing evidence of in- depthunderstanding of the issues. Extremely clearly structured and demonstrating a coherent argument throughout. Evidence of wide, independent reading. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 80-89% Excellent Detailed identification of the issues with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. Well-structured with evidence of independent reading supporting the argument. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 70-79% Very good Identification and very good understanding of issues in the assessment. Full answers to allque stions/task. Very clear argument with relevant examples used to illustrate response. Clear evidence of reading outside the module list. Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

Instructions to Student: • Scale down to 50 marks – Assessment marks. • This is an individual Assignment. • Submit the work proposal for this assignment on Moodle by week 8. • Submit the assignment document on Moodle by Wednesday, Week 12 Note : ? Soft copy of the final document after plagiarism check must be uploaded through Moodle, on and before Wednesday during 12th week of academic calendar. ? Ethical form, declaration form must be uploaded along with your report. Presentation is mandatory for awarding marks and will be conducted only after submission. If absent for presentation, zero marks will be awarded. Presentations will be scheduled during 13th and 14th Week.