Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships

Assignment Help Strategic Management

Reference no: EM133506776 , Length: word count:1200

Management, People and Teams

Assessment - Team Performance Evaluation

Learning Outcome 1: Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying management to achieve high-performing organisations at projects, teams, and individual levels.

Learning Outcome 2: Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships between people and teams in organisations and projects.

Learning Outcome 3: Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem solving skills to manage people in a range of complex contexts.

Learning Outcome 4: Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks in the changing global environment.

Learning Outcome 5: Develop and justify contemporary management strategies to address a variety of people management issues to ensure best practice and quality outcomes.

Assessment Task

You are required to critically assess the performance of your team and recommend improvements based on the relevant concepts and frameworks you have learnt in this subject in a 1,500-word team evaluation report.

Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context
Managers are responsible for the delivery of products/services and results whether that be in an operational or project context. This invariably requires not only the creation and development of teams including performance improvement but also the management of a variety of team, organisational, and cultural dynamics. This assessment requires you to conduct a review of team performance and demonstrate and apply your understanding of team processes and dynamics. In doing so, you will review the performance of the group to which you were allocated for the purpose of Assessments 1 and 2. This will help you to demonstrate analytical, evaluative, and problem-solving skills to develop strategies and actions for performance improvement.

Instructions
1. Review your team's performance in completing the first two assessments and make
recommendations for improvement.

• In reviewing the team performance, considerations must be given to the following:

o How did your team come together and what phases or stages did it go through?
o What roles did team members play?
o What challenges were presented?
o How did individual, team, and contextual dynamics impact performance?
o What would you do differently to improve performance?
o How would you apply your learnings in your current or future workplace?

• Please note that you are not required to review the quality and content of the assessments you produced as a team. Instead, you are required to review the performance of the team in completing the assessment tasks.

• You are required to specifically apply and discuss concepts from Modules 4, 5, and 6 as well as any relevant processes and concepts from earlier modules.

• The evaluation needs to be supported with evidence from academic research as well as examples from your own experiences and or observations. You will also find the module activities useful in prompting your thinking.

2. Write a team evaluation report of 1500 words using the following structure:

• Cover sheet: Student details (student name, ID number, subject code & name, assessment number and title)
• Executive summary
• Table of contents
• Introduction: Outline the purpose and structure of your report.
• Background: Briefly describe your team's purpose and relevant contextual issues.
• Main discussion: Review your team's performance covering key concepts from all modules. Exploring these within an appropriate theoretical framework would be appropriate here.
• Recommendations / action plan: Provide recommended strategies and actions to
improve your team's performance.
• Conclusion
• Reference list
• Appendices

3. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading your assignment-this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.

Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research.

Reference no: EM133506776

Questions Cloud

What many people refer to as the gay rights movement : Identify the primary rights and protections that have been pursued during what many people refer to as the "Gay Rights Movement."

Compare and contrast the cultures of these two organizations : Identify two organizations, one which is founded on Christian principles and one which is founded on secular principles. Compare and contrast the cultures

What is the principal diagnosis : The decision was made to perform cesarean section due to the failed induction. The fetus was found to be in a compound position. What is the principal diagnosis

How did two recent presidents handle the problem : Which social determinant most affects this health issue? How did two recent presidents handle the problem? What would you do differently?

Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships : MGT600 Management, People and Teams, Torrens University - Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying management to achieve high-performing

Just in time inventory system : Just In Time inventory system is one of the four factors that account for changes in the transportation industry in the United States

Explain the automatic vigilance effect and the ingratiation : Explain the Automatic Vigilance Effect and the Ingratiation Effect through the lens of how they have been manifested in your organization.

Discuss what is involved in the leadership of this process : Discuss what is involved in the leadership of this process and how it differs from the company's day-to-day management.

Develop a plan of care for the patient : NUR 2790- He is taken to CT and a tumor near the pancreas is observed. It appears to be blocking the common bile duct. Develop a plan of care for the patient.

User Account

All Pages