Critical evaluation of court case

Reference no: EM131016495

Critical Evaluation of Court Case

It is important to understand the impact an expert testimony may have in the ultimate decision made by a court. In addition, it is helpful for practitioners of forensic psychology to be able to read and understand legal cases.

Tasks: Click here or copy and paste https://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/opnscvwp/1041454.pdf to review the case Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen (2005).

The case describes an appellate legal opinion or court decision involving expert witness testimony. When a case is appealed, it goes to an appellate or to a higher court. The appellate court then reviews the findings of the lower court, which in this case was the trial court. The appellate court offered the following two opinions:

• The first opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 1-24) is the majority opinion and is the one that counts.

• The second opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 24-31) is an opinion filed by a minority of judges who concurred (agreed) in part and dissented (disagreed) in part with the majority of the judges who ruled.

After reading the appellate legal opinion, write a 2- to 3-page paper addressing the following:

• Discuss whether either of the expert witnesses in this case acted unethically. Support your opinion with the relevant APA or specialty ethical guidelines.

• Indicate whether you agree with the majority decision or the minority concurring or dissenting opinion. Explain why.

Reference no: EM131016495

Questions Cloud

The company has just opened a new plant to manufacture : McCracken Aerial, Inc., produces and sells a unique type of TV antenna.

Justify why the company should implement your recommendation : Metrics: Which metrics should the company track using the tool and strategy you have chosen? Why? Explain what each metric represents and why it is important.

Show the various ways that couples goals can be achive : Three retired couples each require an additional annual income of $2000 per year. Prepare a table for each couple showing the various ways that their goals can be achive.

What tactics can attorneys use to elicit estimony : What tactics can attorneys use to elicit or distort testimony from an expert witness? Describe any three tactics you know of from your readings and your experience. Use examples to illustrate your response

Critical evaluation of court case : Critical Evaluation of Court Case - It is important to understand the impact an expert testimony may have in the ultimate decision made by a court. In addition, it is helpful for practitioners of forensic psychology to be able to read and understa..

Describe the fields and options associated with user account : Workgroup networks are small. Domain networks are larger. List at least three other distinctions found in a comparison of workgroups and domains.

What are the potential ethical issues raised in scenario : What are the potential ethical issues raised in this scenario? Be sure to support your response with the appropriate ethical guidelines from the APA's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct and Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Ps..

Discuss the successes and challenges of the pilot : Discuss the problem or challenge you addressed

Implementation of sophisticated derivative strategies : As the manager of a large, well-diversified school endowment fund, you are actively considering the implementation of sophisticated derivative strategies to protect your fund's market value in the event of a substantial decline in the overall leve..

User Account

All Pages