Criminal evidence and procedure

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133812199

Criminal Evidence and Procedure

Incrimination by Silence Paper

A confession is generally viewed as the same as a guilty plea in open court. An incriminating statement differs from a confession in that a confession directly acknowledges guilt, whereas an incriminating statement "is any statement or conduct from which guilt of the crime can be inferred". With that noted, are there situations that you can think of where a person's silence would incline most people to think of it as being incriminating? Please explain three separate situations in which silence could be interpreted to mean the person is hiding something and explain each situation.

Explain three situations in which silence could be interpreted to mean the person is hiding something and explain each. Address three examples in which silence would be incriminating.

Reference no: EM133812199

Questions Cloud

Specific obligations of sellers and lessors : Specific Obligations of Sellers and Lessors Before beginning this interactive, the section Specific Obligations of Sellers and Lessors in your text.

Amendment right to attorney must be observed : After suspect is charged with crime, his/her _____Amendment right to attorney must be observed. Sometimes even silence can constitute an incriminating statement

Constitutional Law : Explaining what historical background you suspect led to the Eighth Amendment being included in the Bill of Rights.

Malicious injury occurs with the intention of killing : Malicious injury occurs with the intention of killing, maiming, disfiguring, or incapacitating another person.

Criminal evidence and procedure : A confession is generally viewed as the same as a guilty plea in open court. An incriminating statement differs from a confession in that a confession

Properly convicted of attempted malicious wounding : A was properly convicted of attempted malicious wounding, we must consider the elements of attempt and the specific definition of malicious wounding.

Without admitting full guilt and involvement in the crime : Explain whether or not defendants should ever be allowed to plead guilty without admitting full guilt and involvement in the crime

Concept of proximate causation requires : The concept of proximate causation requires that an injury be reasonably foreseeable without interruption by an external or superseding cause.

Proximate causation necessitates the injury : Proximate: Proximate causation necessitates the injury to be reasonably foreseeable exclusive of interruption by a superseding cause.

User Account

All Pages