When I proofread the project that I ordered, it was nicely performed and meets all the standards which can be required for the project. I got 96%. Great job thank you! most important 24 hours available. You genuinely took the time to analyze and put a nicely written paper together.

reasonable adiustments to be made to assessment procedures for students with special nests, mice as people with disabilities or vet language or literacy difticuthes. Assessing knowledge is usually assessed through written or oral. short-answer tests whore assessors seek to determine the extent of the Student's knowledge. However. you may need to do the lollowing for a student with • Ask questions orally instead of 10 a written format • Provide equipment such as text enlargers, image enhancers, and vote recorders. • Give the student more time to complete the assessment;, allocate a different time for completion of the assessment; • Oiler a separate, quiet room. • Modifying or providing equipment • Adapting delivery strategies • Ensuring that course activities are sutficenity flexible. providing additional support to student where necessary • Cvstomizine resources and at:bribes nithin the training package or accredrted course • Monitoring the adjustments to ensure student needs continue to be met

• if this is stilt not to the student's satisfaction the student shall forsnally lodge an appeal by submitting a written letter within one week of receiving the results using the term BA for Complairts and appeals outknino the reasons for the appeal. They shall 10CQO this with student administrations department and me appeal shall :ter entered into the 'complaints and appeals register'. • The Operations Manager shall be notified and shall seek details from the assessor involved and any other relevant panes, A decision shall be mate regardir.g the appeal either indicating the assessment decision stands or details of a pcsseile re-assessment by another assessor appointed by Gen. • The stucent shall be notified In writing of the outcome with reasons for the decision. The student shall also be provided. the option of acEvating the external appeals reocess if they are not satisfied with the outcome. The student is required to natty Gen ii they wish tic protect with the external appeals process.

6. If a strident is assessed as "Not Yet Competent' alter the resubmission, he or she will be identified as a student-at-risk and an Academic Performance Improvement (API) Plan will be created during an Intervention Strategy Meeting between the Gen !esthete Operations Manager. Trainer S. Assessor and student. The date for a third assessment will be nominated by the student in consultation with Trainer 5 Assessor. hut should be no longer than 1 month from the previous re-submission date. If We student remains 'Not Yet Competent" alter a third re-submission, he or she Mil be notified that this result is final and he or she will be unable to SteCessluily complete the course in which they are enrolled at this polnL To ensure egu-4y and fairness of assessment let all students, re-submission activities may vary from those orientally set by the traineeassessor. * Due to the variants in the amount of work completed for each assessment task in a unit, 50% will be determined by the amount ci evidence submitted as opposed to the number of assessment :asks submitted. Tit determination will be made by the Trainer & Assessor and approved by the Operations Manager. ,Assessment appeals