Hello i have a new assignment similar to the first assignment. I need 4 pages so please send me invoice for the $50.. i need it no later than tuesday .This Case Study required you to complete a SWOT Analysis and then address the 18 Issues and Problems in this Case…. I got 80/100 because you did not address the 18 issues and problem in the precedent case.( here is the teacher comment: You were NOT able to create a SWOT analysis of the organization…You addressed SOME of the below issues that are identified as part of the Issues and Problems of this case… Well written…somewhat well analyzed…fairly well done…thanks for your efforts….YOUR ASSIGNMENT WAS JUST ON TIME)

60–69% 60–69 points Response answers the Assignment question(s), but digresses significantly; insufficiently uses the text and other literature. Response exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis but does demonstrate comprehension. Sentences are generally wordy and/or ambiguous; tone is too informal. Grammatical skills are inadequate, clarity and meaning are impaired, typically 3–5 errors per page. Inadequate use of APA format. 0–59% 0–59 points Response insufficiently answers the Assignment question(s); insufficiently uses the text and other literature. Response exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis and demonstrates limited knowledge on the subject matter. Sentences unclear enough to impair meaning; tone is inappropriate and/or inconsistent. Grammatical skills are incompetent for college level; typically 6 or more errors per page. Unacceptable use of APA format.

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization Analysis and Critical Thinking 70–79% 70–79 points Response answers the project Assignment(s) with some digression; sufficiently uses the text and other literature. Provides a thesis statement that needs revision. The introduction and conclusion do not set up or close the paper very effectively. Shows too little original thought (strings of citations that are not developed to support the thesis). Main points are adequately defined in only some areas of the paper; points may be over- emphasized or repeated. Some arguments are supported with outside research, but others may not be. Relies too heavily on personal experience or one source. The paper does not meet the source requirements. Some obvious counter- arguments are ignored or not well refuted. Response exhibits limited higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., application of information). Analysis includes limited classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences. Critical thinking includes limited judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization Analysis and Critical Thinking 80–89% 80–89 points Response answers the Assignment question(s) with only minor digressions; sufficiently uses the text and other literature. Provides a good thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion that require some revision but that form a good basis. Develops the main points clearly. Supports most arguments concretely (no logical errors) using outside sources as assigned. Some sources are non- academic with over reliance on web sources. References not always clearly tied to development of ideas. Does not ignore data contradicting its claim, though the refutation may need additional support. Refers to outside sources in the text and reference page. Response generally exhibits higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., evaluation). Paper shows some original thought. Analysis includes adequate classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences. Critical thinking includes adequate judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Grade Content, Focus, Use of Text/Research, and Organization Analysis and Critical Thinking 100% 100 points 50% 50 points 30% 30 points 90–100% 90–100 points Response successfully answers the Assignment question(s); thoroughly uses the text and other literature. Includes a strong thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion. The main points of the paper are developed clearly. All arguments are supported well (no errors in logic) using outside sources as assigned. Sources are primarily academic journals, with thoughtfully used web sources. References are applied substantively to the paper topic. Skillfully addresses counter-arguments and does not ignore data contradicting its claim. Refers to sources both in-text and in the reference page. Response exhibits strong higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., evaluation). Paper shows original thought. Analysis includes proper classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences. Critical thinking includes appropriate judgments, conclusions, and assessments based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

Make sure your document includes: • Your name • Date • Course name and section number • Unit number • Case name • Page numbers The case analysis should be a minimum of 4–6 pages long, double-spaced. Check for correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage. Citations should be in APA style. These papers are related to specific issues or cases and will vary in length. In all cases, papers must be well referenced and in APA format. The papers will be evaluated using the following rubric. At least 20% of a case study paper grade is related to composition that includes organization, writing style, and mechanics. Often, composition issues also impact the grading of the assigned focus paper topic content because composition impacts the effective presentation of your ideas and material.

Case analysis tips: Avoid common errors in case analyses, such as: • Focusing too heavily on minor issues. • Lamenting because of insufficient data in the case and ignoring creative alternatives. • Rehashing of case data — you should assume the reader knows the case. • Not appropriately evaluating the quality of the case's data. • Obscuring the quantitative analysis or making it difficult to understand. Typical “minus (–)” grades result from submissions that: • Are late. • Are not well integrated and lack clarity. • Do not address timing issues. • Do not recognize the cost implications or are not practical. • Get carried away with personal biases and are not pertinent to the key issues. • Are not thoroughly proofread and corrected. Assignment submission: Before you submit your Assignment, you should save your work on your computer in a location that you will remember. Save the document using the naming convention