Communication management plan Weighting 9% Clear evident of lack of understanding of developing communication models. Fail to identify key internal communication information of project. There are many major errors in models. Lack of understanding of developing communication models. Can only identify some key internal communication information of project. There are some major errors in the models Basic understanding of developing communication models. Can identify all key internal communication information of project. There are a few major errors in the models Good understanding of developing communication models. Can identify all key and necessary internal communication information of project. There are some minor errors in the models Excellent understanding of developing communication models. Can identify all key and necessary internal and external communication information of project. There are a few minor errors in the models

Basic understanding of assigning responsibility. The roles are assigned adequately for activities. There are a few major errors in role assignment There are a few major errors in the HR calendar. The calendar is correctly organized and clear to read. Good understanding of assigning responsibility. The roles are assigned adequately for activities. There are some minor errors in role assignment There are some minor errors in the HR calendar. The calendar is correctly organized and clear to read. Excellent understanding of assigning responsibility. The roles are assigned adequately for activities. There are a few minor errors in role assignment There are a few minor errors in the HR calendar. The calendar is highly organized and detailed.

Human Resource management plan Weighting 9% Clear evident of lack of understanding of assigning responsibility. There is no link between the role and activities. There are many major errors in role assignment There are many major errors in the HR calendar. The calendar is poorly organised and difficult to read. Lack of understanding of assigning responsibility. The roles are assigned inadequately for activities. There are some major errors in role assignment There are some major errors in the HR calendar. The calendar is poorly organised and difficult to read.

Quality management plan Weighting 5% Clear evident of lack of understanding of quality concepts. There is no link between quality metrics and the requirements. Poor quality of checklist. Lack of understanding of quality concepts. The quality metrics covered the requirements inadequately. Quality checklist provided inadequately tools to verify the quality. There are some major errors in the checklist and metrics Basic understanding of quality concepts. The quality metrics covered the requirements adequately. Quality checklist provided adequately tools to verify the quality. There are a few major errors in the checklist and metrics Good understanding of quality concepts. The quality metrics covered the requirements adequately. Quality checklist provided adequately tools to verify the quality. There are some minor errors in the checklist and metrics Excellent understanding of quality concepts. The quality metrics covered the requirements in good detailed. Quality checklist provided good tools to verify the quality. There are a few minor errors in the checklist and metrics

Basic understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities adequately but only moderate accuracy. There are a few major errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Adequate explanation but too generic. Basic understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are a few major errors in the diagram. The diagram is correctly organized and clear to read. Good understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities adequately but only moderate accuracy. There are a few minor errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Adequate and clear explanation Good understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are some minor errors in the diagram. The diagram is correctly organized and clear to read Excellent understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities adequately and high accuracy. There are a few minor errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Clear explanation and well application of tools and methods. Excellent understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are a few errors in the diagram. The diagram is highly organized and detailed.

Cost management plan Weighting 10% Clear evident of lack of understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities inadequately. There are many major errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Poor explanation. Clear evident of lack of understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are many major errors in the diagram. The diagram is poorly organised and difficult to read. Lack of understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities inadequately. There are some major errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Inadequately explanation. Lack of understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are some major errors in the diagram. The diagram is poorly organised and difficult to read.

Excellent understanding of defining activities & milestones. Milestones and activities are well defined. Complex level of activity relationship. The estimation of activity is explained in great depth with application of good practices and tools. Excellent understanding of Project schedule network diagram. There are a few minor errors in the diagram. The diagram is well organized and highly detailed. Excellent understanding of developing schedule. The schedule covered the activity list and network diagram in great depth. There are a few minor errors in the schedule structure and information. The schedule is well organized. There are no errors in application of method to develop schedule Excellent understanding of activity’s cost estimation. The estimation covered the activities adequately and high accuracy. There are a few minor errors in cost & budget estimation practice. Clear explanation and well application of tools and methods. Excellent understanding of cost baseline diagram. There are a few errors in the diagram. The diagram is highly organized and detailed.

Basic understanding of defining activities & milestones. The activities covered most of the WBS. Milestones are well defined. Moderate level of relationship between activities. The estimation of activity is explained in general. Basic understanding of Project schedule network diagram. There are a few major errors in the diagram. The diagram is well organized. Basic understanding of developing schedule. The schedule covered the activity list and network diagram adequately. There are a few major errors in the schedule structure and information. The schedule is well organized. There are some errors in application of method to develop schedule Good understanding of defining activities & milestones. The activities covered all the WBS. Milestones are well defined. Good level of activity relationship. The estimation of activity is explained in good details. Good understanding of Project schedule network diagram. There are some minor errors in the diagram. The diagram is well organized. Good understanding of developing schedule. The schedule covered the activity list and network diagram adequately.

Schedule management plan Weighting 10% Clear evident of lack of understanding of defining activities and milestones. There isn’t any link between the activities, milestones and the WBS. Lack of activity relationship. Clear evident of lack of understanding of Project schedule network diagram. There are many major errors in the diagram Clear evident of lack of understanding of developing schedule. There are many major errors in the schedule structure and information. No application of any method. Lack of understanding of defining activities & milestones. The activities covered inadequately the WBS. Milestones are inadequately defined. Inadequate of activity relationship. The estimation of activity duration is inadequately explained

The deliverables covered most of the project objectives. Many of the deliverables are traceable or measureable Basic understanding of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) diagram. The WBS can cover all of the deliverables. The diagram is generally well presented. There are some errors in the WBS structure The requirements covered the deliverables adequately. Some requirements provide clear acceptance criteria The project deliverables covered all the project objectives. Most of the deliverables are traceable or measureable Good understanding of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) diagram. The WBS can cover all of the deliverables. The diagram is well organized there are a few errors in WBS structure The requirements covered the deliverables in good details. Most of the requirements provide clear acceptance criteria. The project deliverables covered all the project objectives in depth which shown exceptional understanding of the projects. There aren’t any untraceable or unmeasurable deliverables

Scope management plan Weighting 10% There is not a clear link between the deliverables and the project objectives. All deliverables are untraceable or unmeasurable. Clear evidence of lack of understanding of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) diagram. There is no clear link between the WBS and the deliverables There is not a clear link between the requirements and deliverables. The requirements don’t provide any specific acceptance criteria. The deliverables covered inadequately the project objectives. Only a few of the deliverables are traceable or measureable Lack of understanding of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) diagram. The WBS can only cover some of the deliverables. The diagram is poorly organised and difficult to read. The requirements covered inadequately the deliverables in details. There are many unclear acceptant criteria of requirements.

B (65-79) A (80-100) The project overview is covered all information provided by the Project charter. Elaborate on some sections within the Project Charter that need further detail The project overview is covered all information provided by the Project charter. Elaborate on some goals & objectives within the Project Charter that need further detail Good understanding of project organization shown by not only be able to identify key roles & authorities but also necessary support roles & authorities. There is some mismatching between roles and authorities. The diagram is coherently organised The project overview is covered all information provided by the Project charter. Elaborate on all sections within the Project Charter that need further detail The project overview is covered all information provided by the Project charter. Elaborate on all goals & objectives within the Project Charter that need further detail Excellent understanding. Exceptional ability to identify and matching all roles and authorities necessary for the project. There is only a few of mismatching between roles and authorities. The diagram is exceptionally well structured

Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) C (50-64) Introduction Weighting 10% The project overview is unclear. There is not a clear link between the project overview and the project charter The project’s objectives are unclear. There is not a clear link between the project objectives and the goals in project charter Clear evidence of lack of understanding of project organization necessary for a project. Fails to identify key roles & authorities. The project overview covered inadequately information provided by the project charter The project objectives covered inadequately the goals provided by the project charter Lack of understanding of project organization. Can only identify some key roles & authorities. The diagram is poorly organised and difficult to read The project overview is covered all information provided by the Project charter The project overview is covered all goals provided by the Project charter Basic understanding of project organization. Identify all key roles & authorities. The diagram is generally well organised