len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:46 PM
Is well-written and
adheres to the
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or
summary).
Demonstrates
consistent use of high
quality, credible and
relevant research
sources to support and
develop ideas.
There are no mistakes
in using the APA style.
Is very well-written and
adheres to the
academic genre.
Consistently
demonstrates expert
use of good quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
appropriate arguments
and statements. Shows
evidence of reading
beyond the key reading
There are no mistakes
in using the APA style.
Expertly written and
adheres to the
academic genre.
Demonstrates expert
use of high-quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
arguments and
position statements.
Shows extensive
evidence of reading
beyond the key reading
There are no mistakes
in using the APA Style.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:35 PM
Use of academic and
discipline conventions
and sources of
evidence
10%
Poorly written with
errors in spelling,
grammar.
Demonstrates
inconsistent use of
good quality, credible
and relevant research
sources to support and
develop ideas.
There are mistakes in
using the APA style.
Is written according to
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or
summary) and has
accurate spelling,
grammar, sentence
and paragraph
construction.
Demonstrates
consistent use of
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
ideas, but these are
not always explicit or
well developed.
There are no mistakes
in using the APA style.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:26 PM
Identifies key
stakeholders and
communication
processes.
Articulates appropriate
strategies to
communicate project
risk analysis result with
key stakeholders.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are very well
presented; the
Performs high level of
communication and
stakeholder analysis.
Clearly demonstrates
effective strategies to
communicate results of
the project risk analysis
with a range of key
stakeholders.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical,
persuasive, and well
supported by evidence
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:19 PM
Reporting and
stakeholder
communication
45%
Limited knowledge,
skill and/or experience
in stakeholders and
communication
management.
Difficult to understand
for audience, no
logical/clear structure,
poor flow of ideas,
argument lacks
supporting evidence.
Understands
stakeholders and
communication
management principles
and processes.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are presented
in a way that is not
always clear and
logical.
Identifies key
stakeholders and
communication
processes.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are well
presented, mostly clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:10 PM
Distinction
(75-84)
High Distinction
(85-100)
Presents a coherent
and detailed analysis of
project risks and
develops a range of
strategies to manage
those risks
Well demonstrated
capacity to explain
risks and risk
management
strategies
Critically analyses and
evaluates project risks
and formulate a range
of strategies to
effectively manage
those risks
Mastery of risks and
risk management
strategies and
application to further
learning
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:07:02 PM
Assessment Attributes Fail
(0-49)
Pass
(50-64)
Credit
(65-74)
Critical analysis of
project risks and
development of a
range of strategies to
manage those risks
45%
Fails to analyse project
risks and/or develop
strategies to manage
those risks
Minimal analysis of
project risks and
development of
strategies to manage
those risks
Demonstrates limited
awareness of risks and
risk management
strategies
Analyses project risks
and develops
strategies to manage
those risks
Demonstrates a
capacity to explain
risks and risk
management
strategies
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:47 PM
Is well-written and
adheres to the
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or
summary).
Demonstrates
consistent use of high
quality, credible and
relevant research
sources to support and
develop ideas.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
Is very well-written
and adheres to the
academic genre.
Consistently
demonstrates expert
use of good quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
appropriate
arguments and
statements. Shows
evidence of reading
beyond the key
reading
There are no mistakes
in using the APA style.
Expertly written and
adheres to the
academic genre.
Demonstrates expert
use of high-quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
arguments and position
statements. Shows
extensive evidence of
reading beyond the key
reading
There are no mistakes in
using the APA Style.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:37 PM
Use of academic
and discipline
conventions and
sources of
evidence
10%
Poorly written with errors
in spelling, grammar.
Demonstrates
inconsistent use of good
quality, credible and
relevant research sources
to support and develop
ideas.
There are mistakes in
using the APA style.
Is written according to
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or summary)
and has accurate
spelling, grammar,
sentence and paragraph
construction.
Demonstrates
consistent use of
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
ideas, but these are not
always explicit or well
developed.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:30 PM
Information,
arguments and
evidence are very well
presented, the
presentation is logical,
clear and well
supported by
evidence.
Engages the audience,
demonstrates cultural
sensitivity.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical,
persuasive, and well
supported by evidence,
demonstrating a clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
Engages and sustains
audience’s interest in
the topic, demonstrates
high levels of cultural
sensitivity
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:22 PM
Effective
communications
30%
Difficult to understand for
audience, no logical/clear
structure, poor flow of
ideas, argument lacks
supporting evidence.
No effort is made to keep
audience engaged,
audience cannot follow
the line of reasoning.
Information, arguments
and evidence are
presented in a way that
is not always clear and
logical.
Attempts are made to
keep the audience
engaged, but not always
successful. Line of
reasoning is often
difficult to follow.
Information, arguments
and evidence are well
presented, mostly clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
The audience is mostly
engaged, line of
reasoning is easy to
follow.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:13 PM
High Distinction
(85-100)
A sophisticated
understanding of the
challenges and pitfalls
of traffic light reports,
the difference between
the status reports.
Critically discriminates
between assertion of
personal opinion and
information
substantiated by robust
evidence from the
research/course
materials
Contribution is
comprehensive and
advances the class
discussion.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:06:05 PM
Credit
(65-74)
Distinction
(75-84)
Contributes to
identifying the
challenges and pitfalls
of traffic light reports,
the difference between
the status reports.
Shows some
understanding of
project status reporting.
Supports personal
opinion and information
substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
Demonstrates a
capacity to explain and
apply relevant concepts.
Contributes to
identifying the
challenges and pitfalls
of traffic light reports,
the difference
between the status
reports.
Work shows insight
and thorough
understanding of
project status
reporting.
Discriminates between
assertion of personal
opinion and
information
substantiated by
robust evidence from
the research/course
materials
Well demonstrated
capacity to explain
and apply relevant
concepts.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:05:43 PM
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(0-49)
Pass
(50-64)
Contribution to
identifying
the challenges and
pitfalls of traffic
light reports, the
difference
between the
status reports
60%
Fails to contribute to
identifying the challenges
and pitfalls of traffic light
reports, the difference
between the status
reports.
Limited knowledge of
project status reporting.
Contributes to
identifying the
challenges and pitfalls
of traffic light reports,
the difference between
the status reports.
Demonstrates limited
awareness of project
status reporting.
Resembles a recall or
summary of key ideas.
Often
conflates/confuses
assertion of personal
opinion with
information
substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
|
len2088784
8/17/2018 11:05:17 PM
I got one more assignment from different subject worth 1000 words attached below is the case study related to the assignment and the assignment brief u just need to work on part B as part A has already been completed. U have to make a risk management report whose matrix and example is given in PMBOK guide. ONLY PART B NEEDS TO BE DONE IN 1000 WORDS.
|