Length: 2000 Word Limit. The previous assessment is done on Organisation name : Commonwealth Bank, So you have to take the same company name Also explain learning outcomes for the same, do it best so that I can give you my next assessment, I didn't score good marks in this assessment so need to perform well in this My lecturer is very strict he checks the assignment very neatly, So be careful of plagiarism Also please cover and explain all the points attached in image.

The report is to be limited to 2000 words, exclusive of formal document sections (i.e. title page, executive summary, table of contents, references list, appendices, etc.), citations, tables and graphs. Students should submit one file through Turnitin. There are a number of forms the report could take. The exact form of the report will depend on the additional research the student will undertake; students should aim for the demonstration of deep learning, founded on reflection, rather than on getting any aspect of the brief ‘right.'

Students should commence this assignment early, keep regular backups and ensure they submit the correct, final version. Students should use this brief as the instruction set for the assignment requirements. Additionally, the rubric below can be used to describe what unacceptable, functional, proficient, advanced and exceptional assignments might look like according to the criteria in the leftmost column of each row. As this is a Masters level subject, students are expected to engage with high-quality academic journal articles, using the Torrens University Library. Textbooks, Wikipedia and, in general, anything that can be obtained through an open Google search page are considered supplementary material, unbecoming of a postgraduate.

Learning Rubrics - There are numerous ways to interpret the assessment brief. This rubric should not be used as a prescription or tick-the-box list of requirements but as a description of an amalgam of several possible interpretations and the standards they might take. The assessment will be graded holistically, based on the criteria in the leftmost column. Your interpretation may not match the rubric exactly as you may extend the requirements, using your initiative to demonstrate your mastery of the subject matter. Additionally, you may demonstrate elements described in the Advanced column and still be graded ‘Functional' for one or more of the criteria (the reverse trend is also possible). Higher performing submissions will depend on wider reading, rather than on the rubric verbatim.

Effective Communication (30%) Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience's interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity. Uses a wide range of structures with flexibility and accuracy demonstrating a sophisticated control of lexical features. Assessment of strengths and weaknesses (30%) Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of each element of the SWOT analysis and integrates PEST analysis factors.

Articulation of research principles (20%) The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is exceptionally clear. The Rationale for the research methodology is compared and evaluated against alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question/project. Consciousness of diversity in the case study (20%) Skillfully interprets intercultural factors from the perspectives of own and other worldviews.