Could btt avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake

Reference no: EM13475741

Big Time Toymaker (BTT) develops, manufactures, and distributes board games and other toys to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Chou is the inventor of a new strategy game he named Strat. BTT was interested in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou whereby BTT paid him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. The exclusive negotiation agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Just three days before the expiration of the 90-day period, the parties reached an oral distribution agreement at a meeting. Chou offered to draft the contract that would memorialize their agreement. Before Chou drafted the agreement, a BTT manager sent Chou an e-mail with the subject line "Strat Deal" that repeated the key terms of the distribution agreement including price, time frames, and obligations of both parties. Although the e-mail never used the word contract, it stated that all of the terms had been agreed upon. Chou believed that this e-mail was meant to replace the earlier notion that he should draft a contract, and one month passed. BTT then sent Chou a fax requesting that he send a draft for a distribution agreement contract. Despite the fact that Chou did so immediately after receiving the BTT fax, several more months passed without response from BTT. BTT had a change in management and informed Chou they were not interested in distributing Strat.

1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract?

2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties' objective intent to contract?

3. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2?

4. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract?

5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?

6. Assuming, arguendo, that this e-mail does constitute an agreement, what consideration supports this agreement?

Reference no: EM13475741

Questions Cloud

The president of party plates has requested a new proposal : scenario the president of party plates has requested a new proposal from your team. she would like information on

Follow writing principles of unity coherence and emphasis : write a four to fivenbsp paragraph form letter to potential customers on the range of services your business or

Clculate performance measures of each of funds a b and c : the following data are available relating to the performance of csf equity fund and the market portfolionbspfund afund

What could you use as a symbol for two of the following the : what could you use as a symbol for two of the following? the threat of terrorism increasing violence in schools

Could btt avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake : big time toymaker btt develops manufactures and distributes board games and other toys to the united states mexico and

Determine the capacity of education systems to utilize : the time has come to select your two proposed target countries for edutots expansion. prepare a 10-14 slide

Assignment can you help me to answer these question i need : can you help me to answer these question? ltbrgti need to complete it on 1492014 so can you do it quicklu for me pls?

What doesnt occur to us though is that schools and : what doesnt occur to us though is that schools and colleges might be at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into

The one-year forward price of euro is 12900 find out : suppose the us dollar and euro interest rate for the next one year are 1.5 and 2 respectively. both are annually

User Account

All Pages