Reference no: EM133784470
Assignment:
Review and revise.
Introducing Public Administration by Jay Shafritz, 10th edition: Public Administration: Ch. 10,11
APA direct quotes to be included.
Legitimacy in public administration is characterized by two constructs: procedural legitimacy, which refers to the belief that public institutions are fair, transparent, and accountable, and substantive legitimacy, which is the perception that public policies are just and responsive to citizens' needs. Both aspects align with the American Society for Public Administration's Principle of Service, which states that public servants should serve the public interest and promote the well-being of citizens. Foundational theories and theorists, such as Weber's Bureaucratic Theory, Habermas's Communicative Action Theory, and Luce and Perry's Democratic Legitimacy Theory, have contributed to understanding legitimacy in public administration. Adhering to these principles and aligning with the ASPA Code of Ethics can foster trust, accountability, and responsiveness in public service.
Explanation:
Legitimacy in Public Administration: Characteristics, Constructs, and ASPA's Code of Ethics
Two Characteristics and Constructs of Legitimacy in Public Administration
- Procedural Legitimacy: This pertains to the belief that governmental institutions and processes exhibit fairness, transparency, and accountability. It is founded on the principle that decisions are rendered through legitimate mechanisms, including equitable elections, transparent decision-making processes, and adherence to due process.
- Substantive Legitimacy: This denotes the belief that public policies and outcomes are equitable and attuned to the requirements of residents. It is predicated on the conviction that the government is proficient in resolving societal issues and advancing the collective welfare.
Alignment with ASPA's Code of Ethics
Both procedural and substantive legitimacy correspond with the Principle of Service in the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Code of Ethics. This principle asserts that public personnel must prioritize the public interest and enhance the welfare of citizens. Procedural legitimacy guarantees fairness and transparency in decision-making processes, whereas substantive legitimacy ensures that policies and outcomes address the public's demands.
Foundational Theories and Theorists
Numerous foundational theories and theorists have enhanced our comprehension of legitimacy in public administration.
- Weber's Bureaucratic Theory: Max Weber's bureaucratic theory highlighted the significance of legal-rational authority and procedural legitimacy. Bureaucracies adhering to explicit norms and processes are more likely to be seen as legitimate.
- Habermas's Communicative Action Theory: Jürgen Habermas contended that legitimacy relies on transparent and inclusive discourse between citizens and their government. Public institutions must address the interests and concerns of citizens and engage in discourse to uphold legitimacy.
- Luce and Perry's Theory of Democratic Legitimacy: Luce and Perry underscored the significance of both procedural and substantive legitimacy in democratic administration. They contended that legitimacy relies on the belief that the government is equitable and efficient.
In summary, procedural and substantive legitimacy are crucial for efficient public administration. By adhering to these values and conforming to the ASPA Code of Ethics, public workers can foster trust, accountability, and responsiveness in their endeavors.
Additional reference:
ASPA CODE OF ETHICS