Reference no: EM131050162 , Length: word count:2000

Assignment Topic

Huang is the son of a successful Malaysian business people and works for his parents company. Huang owns a home in a suburb of Melbourne. The allotment of land upon which the house is built is quite large and Huang decides to construct a small factory and workshop at the rear of his property.

Huang has submitted a tender to a manufacturing company to make and assemble components for the company, and he intends to use the factory and workshop to house the machinery and equipment that he needs to use in this process.

His tender has been accepted, and he needs to have the garage and workshop completed by 1st November if he is to meet the deadline for supply of the components for which he has submitted the tender.

Huang contacts Bill, a registered builder and discusses with Bill his requirements for the construction of the garage and workshop. He explains to Bill that he needs the buildings to be completed by 1st November, but he does not tell Bill why that date is important to Huang. Bill assumes that Huang is going to use the factory and workshop for domestic and recreational purposes.

He agrees to build the factory and workshop for Huang, and to complete the construction by 1st November. Due to delays on the part of Bill, construction of the buildings is not completed until the following February, and Huang loses the contract for the supply of the components.

The loss of the contract is directly due to the fact that Bill did not complete construction of the garage and workshop by 1st November as promised. The delay in completion of the contract by Bill has therefore resulted in a loss to Huang of $150,000.
Huang now wishes to sue Bill for breach of his building contract and to claim from Bill the sum of $150,000 that he says has resulted from Bill's breach of the contract. Advise Huang of his legal/contractual rights.

NOTES FOR STUDENTS

1. This is a Research assignment - students should not expect this material to be covered in class before the Due Date of the assignment.

Students should accordingly commence their own research into the assignment topic Students must use texts, scholarly articles and reputable online resources for their research, and these items, together with relevant cases and legislation, should be referred to in the assignment.

2. The assignment is 2,000 words (+/-10%) in length.

3. The assignment must be typed or printed on one side only of A4 paper with 1.5 or double spacing and leaving a left-hand margin wide enough for examiners' comments and corrections.

4. The completed assignment must be submitted with an "Assignment Cover Sheet" available from School office and duly completed in all respects, including Lecturer name.

5. The assignment must include footnotes, a bibliography and may include a synopsis.

6. Students are strongly advised to study the notes on assignment preparation and the notes on plagiarism contained in the Law Students Manual.

7. Assignments will be marked out of a possible 40 marks.

8. Assignments submitted after the due date will incur a penalty for late submission of one mark for each day the assignment is overdue, unless an extension of time has been obtained from the subject lecturer or tutor prior to the due date.

Any application for extension of time must be lodged on the appropriate form obtainable from the Faculty office and must be accompanied by any supporting evidence of the facts upon which the application is based.

Tips: Useful Cases: Newman Hadley V Baxandale Victoria Laundry V Newton Industries Also Refer to Contract Law Commonwealth of Australia before going to case With the assignment, find the law as first port of your call and then go and cite. Find the case if you need a little further back up.

Guide your readers with I R A C model.

Do not argue new idea in conclusion. The moment you quote more than 3 lines from HCA, you must block quote. Less than that you can paraphrase. When in doubt, cite, when in doubt, paraphrase. If you find that course, 80% of your work is done. If not same case, but similar, you can still compare and show differences, and conclude with your opinion. The verdict may be this. The court held .... etc.