55-64% C+/B- (Competent) - A reasonably balanced summary of the issues as reflected in course study materials. Adequate content but lacking theoretical depth. - Clear introduction, with some organization of main points but lacking clear links and/or thematic sequence - The text of the assignment shows that the course materials have been read and acknowledged. An accurate bibliography is attached - Most presentation details met e.g. spacing, fonts, margin, legibility, citations, grammar, and spelling. 50-54% C (Acceptable) - Assignment requirements/topic not fully covered. Material is insufficiently elaborated. - Overuse of quotations with little explanation. Acceptable but flawed content - Adequate introduction, with structure barely discernible and/or somewhat confused and some major points missed. - Reference material is not well integrated into text of the assignment. Little evidence that quality of sources has been considered. - Limited acknowledgement and light bibliography - Minor presentation flaws.

Grade Criteria 75-100% A-/A/A+ (Outstanding /Excellent) - A comprehensive exploration of the topic, with sound critical comment and a clear synthesis of the issues. Original and/or scholarly content and depth of theoretical analysis. - A lucid and logically structured argument with systematic and critical evaluation of the main points. - Detailed support from literature with references appropriately integrated. - High quality sources identified, interpreted and evaluated - Virtually flawless presentation. Clear, concise and logically presented argument and/or discussion. 65-74% B/B+ (Very Good) - A systematic exploration of the assignment topic which may include some critical comment and appraisal. Substantive content. - Clear introduction, conclusion and thematic sequence, with main points elaborated. - Regular support provided from the literature. Use of quotes where appropriate, with some interpretive comment. - Clear expression, well-constructed sentences and paragraphs with few presentation flaws.

Recommendations /10 - Details the course of action that should be followed - Recommendations flow from findings - Action oriented & focus on the future - Are specific, realistic and achievable (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 2 marks per argument with example = 10 marks total) Presentation /5 - Clear communication - Sound structure - Format, layout, spelling, grammer etc - Uses appendices to supplement discussion - In own language (i.e., >90% paraphrased & <10% quotes). Research /5 - Relevant information - Sources referenced correctly - Broad and deep reference material - Valid information - Referencing, in-text and listed TOTAL MARKS (%) 100.00

Question 4) /15 - Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts - Uses evidence to back claims - Is logical and creates sound argument - Major topics identified - Develops the main issues/themes (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 3 marks per argument with example = 15 marks total) Section Marking Criteria Mark Question 5) /20 - Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts - Uses evidence to back claims - Is logical and creates sound argument - Major topics identified - Develops the main issues/themes (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 4 marks per argument with example = 20 marks total) Conclusions /15 - Summarises the key findings – the key issues or problems in the situation - Grounded in the present situation - Listed as numbered points in order of importance - Relate directly to the objectives of the Business Case (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 3 marks per argument with example = 15 marks total)

Discussion Section: Questions 1 - 5 Question 1) /5 - Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts - Uses evidence to back claims - Is logical and creates sound argument - Major topics identified - Develops the main issues/themes (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 1 marks per argument with example = 5 marks total) Question 2) /10 - Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts - Uses evidence to back claims - Is logical and creates sound argument - Major topics identified - Develops the main issues/themes (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 2 marks per argument with example = 10 marks total) Question 3) /10 - Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts - Uses evidence to back claims - Is logical and creates sound argument - Major topics identified - Develops the main issues/themes (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 2 marks per argument with example = 10 marks total)

Please go through the attachment there should be an introduction about 1-6 question. Please follow the marking criteria /formats Weightage 60% Due: 10am Friday 16th Section Marking Criteria Title - Well-chosen subject Executive summary - A useful summary of the entire Business Case - Covers the essence of the aims, objectives, findings and main recommendations. Introduction /5 - Provides an overview of the subject matter of the Business Case - Establishes the context of the Business Case - Includes a statement about the change, problem or issue that needs investigating - Terms of reference or scope of the Business Case - Defines the objectives of the Business Case - Sets readers expectations - States any limitations or assumptions (Expectation of 5 points of argument with example. 1 marks per argument with example = 5 marks total)