Every thing seems good prepared the solution keeping everything in mind related to graduation grade level. I will prefer to friends you guys are good and helpful and all the required criterias are fulfilled in the assignment, Thanks.

Presentation You report will include following Title page Table of contents Introduction Body of report covering the items above and Conclusion and references. Only the body of the report is included in the word count.

Satisfactory academic communication, incorporating academic writing conventions. Some structure. Referencing included with some accuracies. At least 10 credible sources with at least 5 quality academic journals Used (evidenced by citations) A good range of information is accessed and utilised. Unsatisfactory academic communication, incorporating poor academic writing conventions. No structure No referencing, less than 8 credible sources or lack of credible sources.

Professional report writing skills Research and academic Literacy Mark /20 Outstanding academic communication, including following academic writing conventions for a report. Clear & correct structure using section headings & heading hierarchy that develop the discussion; outstanding presentation. Referencing is consistently accurate. At least 14 credible sources with at least 9 quality academic journals Used (evidenced by citations) Broad and varied sources of information accessed and utilised in a detailed way.

Provides a critical review and reflection of own Leadership in the light of one of the chose theories Mark /30 Reflective learning is strongly informed by appropriate review of own style against one of the theories. Specific examples which demonstrate self-insight. Some reflective learning informed by appropriate review of own style against one of the theories. Some examples but more specific examples or more insight could be demonstrated No reflective learning and general reference to own style against a theory No specific examples

Good CR Satisfactory PS FL Accurate identification of two leadership theories with rationale for choice. Detailed literature review which synthesizes some of the information the information but has some elements of a descriptive list or a set of summaries Demonstrates some evidence of analytical and evaluative skills but more in-depth analysis required. Demonstrates some evidence of analytical and evaluative skills but development of arguments is limited. No identification of leadership theories. No Rationale for choice Literature review is a descriptive list or a set of summaries No or little evidence of analytical and evaluative skills and development of arguments is limited.

Criteria Excellent HD Very Good DI Leadership research and analysis Identifies two leadership theories Conducts Literature review Critically reviews the chosen theories in the light of the leadership literature . Mark /50 Accurate and detailed identification of two leadership theories with rationale for choice. Detailed literature review which synthesizes the information and goes beyond a descriptive list or a set of summaries Analysis is logical and generates valid conclusions and practical insights. Deep knowledge and understanding of the concept of leadership and leadership theory is evident through analysis and illustration. Independently takes and critiques multiple perspectives and synthesises these to draw conclusions.