Reference no: EM13137313
Quality Associates, Inc., a consulting firm, advises its clients about sampling and statistical procedures that can be used to control their manufacturing processes. In one particular application, a client gave quality a sample of 800 observations taken during a time in which that client's processes was operating satisfactorily. The sample standard deviation for these data was 0.21; hence, with so much data, the population standard deviation was assumed to be 0.21. Quality associates then suggested that random samples of size 30 be taken periodically to monitor the processes on an ongoing basis. By analyzing the new samples, the clients could quickly learn whether the process was operating satisfactorily. When the process was not operating satisfactorily, corrective action could be taken to eliminate the problem. The design specification indicated the mean for the process should be 12. The hypothesis test suggested by Quality Associates follows:
H o : μ is 12
H a: μ is not 12
Corrective action will be taken any time the null hypothesis is rejected.
The samples in the attached Excel file were collected at hourly intervals during the first day of operation of the new statistical process control procedure.
Managerial Report
1. Conduct a hypothesis test for each sample at the 0.01 level of significance and determine what action, if any should be taken. Provide a test statistic and p-value for each test. Make sure to present the results of the tests in table form.
2. Compute the standard deviation for each of the four samples. Does the assumption of 0.21 for the population standard deviation appear reasonable? Explain your answer briefly.
3. Compute the limits for the sample mean around μ =12 such that, as long as a new sample mean is within those limits, the process will be considered to be operating satisfactorily. If the sample mean exceeds the upper limit of of the sample mean is below the lower limit, corrective action will be taken. These limits are referred to as upper and lower control limits for the quality control purposes. Make sure to show me how you got your answers.
4. Discuss the implications of changing the level of significance to a larger value. What mistake or error could increase if the level of significance is increased? Any answer you give to this question must be explained, a simple answer is not worth anything.
Which statements is accurate with respect to the federal
: Under Carl's will, Carl created a testamentary trust to be funded with $700,000 worth of assets. All of the income of the trust is payable to Carl's child, Jane, for her life, and thereafter, the remaining assets of the trust will pass to The Publ..
|
Computer security and etiquette are critical incommunication
: Computer security and etiquette are critical in effective communication. Each day we must be careful to insure that our personal information is not compromised. Computer etiquette is critical for effective communication.How does proper computer etiqu..
|
Carry out hypothesis test to see if claim may be refuted
: Carry out a hypothesis test to see if this claim may be refuted. State the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis that we would use for this test.
|
Calculate discount rate used by the lender
: Columbo Co treasurer signed a note promising to pay 240000 on December 31 2010 .The proceeds of the note were 232,000 . calculate discount rate used by the lender
|
Conduct a hypothesis test for each sample
: Conduct a hypothesis test for each sample at the 0.01 level of significance and determine what action, if any should be taken.
|
Prepare a schedule to show the balance
: On January 3, 2011, Jenkins Corp. acquired 40% of the outstanding common stock of Bolivar Co for $1,200,000. This acquisition gave Jenkins the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee.
|
Correction of an error in the financial statements
: Correction of an error in the financial statements of a prior period discovered subsequent to their issuance.
|
Calculate return on total assets
: A company had net income of $450,000 in 2009 and $620,000 in 2010. The company had average total assets of $2,500,000 in 2009 and $3,000,000 in 2010. Calculate the return on total assets for 2009 and 2010. Comment on the results.
|
Calculate the mass
: calculate the mass, in grams, at 25 degrees celcius of 30.0mL of propylene glycol, which has a density of 1.036g/mL
|