Concept of proximate causation requires

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133812196

Question

The concept of proximate causation requires that an injury be "reasonably foreseeable" without interruption by an external or superseding cause. In this scenario, A's lack of attention necessitated sudden braking. Passengers who used their seatbelts correctly were unharmed, indicating the braking was appropriate under the circumstances. The plaintiff, the only injured passenger, did not wear a seatbelt, which complicates assigning full responsibility for the accident. Consequently, the defendant's decision to brake is likely deemed correct and cannot be directly connected to the plaintiff's injury.

Reference no: EM133812196

Questions Cloud

Malicious injury occurs with the intention of killing : Malicious injury occurs with the intention of killing, maiming, disfiguring, or incapacitating another person.

Criminal evidence and procedure : A confession is generally viewed as the same as a guilty plea in open court. An incriminating statement differs from a confession in that a confession

Properly convicted of attempted malicious wounding : A was properly convicted of attempted malicious wounding, we must consider the elements of attempt and the specific definition of malicious wounding.

Without admitting full guilt and involvement in the crime : Explain whether or not defendants should ever be allowed to plead guilty without admitting full guilt and involvement in the crime

Concept of proximate causation requires : The concept of proximate causation requires that an injury be reasonably foreseeable without interruption by an external or superseding cause.

Proximate causation necessitates the injury : Proximate: Proximate causation necessitates the injury to be reasonably foreseeable exclusive of interruption by a superseding cause.

Introducing issues surrounding unethical practices : When introducing the issues surrounding unethical practices in the auto repair industry, the case of Lisa stands out as a compelling example.

What are differences between realism and formalism : What are the differences between realism and formalism? What are the consequences-positive or negative-of espousing legal realism?

In jurisdictions that practice contributory negligence : In jurisdictions that practice contributory negligence, if any negligence is found on behalf of the defendant there is no recovery.

User Account

All Pages