This subject is People, Culture and Contemporary Leadership. As you will see in the assessment outline there are many organisational crisis mentioned so you have to select any one and then by one leadership style you have to provide with the answer. The second doc attached is for understanding the questions. Remember as given in the marking rubric organisational crisis stands only for 10 marks wheres as leadership has 30 marks. So you have to prepare PP slides with some examples if appropriate , 3 or 4 academic references, 1 or 2 images where appropriate and notes to explain that slides in 5 minute video for both the copies . Remember that if you are using any crisis and then the leadership style they should reasonably appropriately relate to each other. In both copies the organisational crisis and leadership style should be different. My due date is of today 11:55 pm AEST so If you send me 1st copy with 4 to 5 hours it would be great and the 2nd copy if you send me tomorrow upto afternoon AEST that will be alright. Note: - please go through the marking rubric carefully once so that you can see which parts carries what marks that is extremely crucial.

Recommendations on how those disadvantages can be overcome (10 marks) The recommendations are either missing or are not convincing in terms of their ability to solve the crisis. The recommendations are fair but are only covered superficially and in a manager that is not engaging. The recommendations are solid and they are presented in a clear way. However, there is very little creativity. The recommendations are strong. Only minor improvements are needed in terms of presentation style. The recommendations are supported by research and are presented in a creative and compelling manner.

Disadvantages of the leadership style in solving the crisis (10 marks) The disadvantages are missing or incorrectly portrayed. The style of presenting is also difficult to follow and at times incoherent. The disadvantages are only briefly described and weakly linked to the type of crisis. The presentation style needs major work. The disadvantages are credible but elaboration is needed. The presentation style is good but not compelling or persuasive enough. The disadvantages are covered with enough depth. Only minor improvements are needed to the style of presentation. In addition to thoroughly conveyed disadvantages, the presentation style is also creative and highly engaging.

Advantages of the leadership style in solving the crisis (10 marks) The advantages are missing or incorrectly portrayed. The style of presenting is also difficult to follow and at times incoherent. The advantages are only briefly described and weakly linked to the type of crisis. The presentation style needs major work. The advantages are credible but elaboration is needed. The presentation style is good but not compelling or persuasive enough. The advantages are covered with enough depth. Only minor improvements are needed to the style of presentation. In addition to thoroughly conveyed advantages, the presentation style is also creative and highly engaging.

Consequences of the crisis (5 marks) The consequences are missing or incorrectly portrayed. The style of presenting is also difficult to follow and at times incoherent. The consequences are only briefly described and weakly linked to the type of crisis. The presentation style needs major work. The consequences are credible but elaboration is needed. The presentation style is good but not compelling enough. The consequences are covered with enough depth. Only minor improvements are needed to the style of presentation. In addition to thoroughly conveyed consequences, the presentation style is also creative and highly engaging.

Assessment Title: Assessment 3 – Video Presentation Weighting / Marks: 40% (i.e. a total of 40 marks available) Length: 5 minutes Criterion Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Likely causes of the organisational crisis (5 marks) The causes are either missing or incorrectly portrayed. The style of presenting is also difficult to follow and at times incoherent. The causes are only briefly described and weakly linked to the type of crisis. The presentation style needs major work. The causes are credible but elaboration is needed. The presentation style is good but not compelling enough. The causes are covered with enough depth. Only minor improvements are needed to the style of presentation. In addition to thoroughly conveyed causes, the presentation style is also creative and highly engaging.