Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence 10% Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high- quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.

Personal learning Reflection: Key knowledge and skills learned from this subject. Lesson learnt and benefits for future study and career. 50% A sophisticated understanding of Integrated project management, plan, processes, life cycle and/or enterprise environment factors. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Expertly articulates, justifies and apply tools or techniques for future study and career. Well structured report follow reflection frameworks Demonstrates the ability to question own biases, stereotypes, preconceptions and define new modes of thinking as a result. Risks asking probing questions about self and attempts to answer these.

Review and Analysis on the feedback from the cohort: 20% List all constructive feedback from the cohort, including critiques Review and thorough analysis the contents, clearly categorised them according to BPI commentary and presentation; Incorporated feedback into reflection report, detailed discussion on how the feedback will benefit future performance.

Description of case study and key elements of commentary. 20% Excellent and concise description of the case study, covered all elements in brief and professional language. Discuss the outcomes and the impacts of BPI on organisation from both positive and negative aspects; Logical and core information provided from the commentary on BPI practice; Relevant theoretical and/or practical evidence presented as justification to support the evaluation;

Presentation delivery and Q&A: 30% Presenters demonstrated a great deal of confidence and strong connection with audiences, including body languages and eye contact; Contents are delivered in a logical cohesive, and sensible manner; Use engaging, professional and straightforward language, well explained on technical terminologies; Appropriately use various types of visual aids to support delivery, incorporating with available technologies. Handle questions with confidence, provide simple and proper answers with justification Constructive feedback to peers: 20% Actively offers detailed constructive feedback, specific and appropriate; Expertly articulated the presentation contents and BPI, effectively communicates them to peers. Provides excellent assistance, support, and encouragement to peers. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst peers.

Assessment Attributes Presentation Contents and Structure: 50% High Distinction (85-100) Solid and accurate information obtained from the case study; Specific and appropriate data and evidence used to support the commentary; Comprehensive and in-depth analysis, critique and justification presented with none-bias evaluation; Strong connection and utilisation of BPM and BPI knowledge and tools in the presentation; Clearly structured contents, using agenda, heading, sub-headings, easy to follow; Strong opening, clear topics and opinions stated with a conclusive ending; Extra research conducted and demonstrated through valid sources.

Assessment 2: Business Process Improvement Reflection (2 parts) Part A: Presentation: Comments on Best Practice of BPI Case study Part B: Reflection Report: Best Practice of BPI case study (Incorporating the feedback from the cohort)