yes, 100% happy with the assignment which expert made with 100% uniqueness and in APA format as desired. I would prefer this expert once again for my next one. Its really very well done as it is my first experience. I will get made more assignments soon.

4. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Partially examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Partially justified your response. Satisfactorily examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Satisfactorily justified your response. Thoroughly examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Thoroughly justified your response.

2. Examine at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Justify your response. Weight: 30% Did not submit or incompletely examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. Insufficiently examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Insufficiently justified your response.

2. Compare the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely compared the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill. Insufficiently compared the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill. Partially compared the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill. Satisfactorily compared the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill. Thoroughly compared the United Nations member’s stances on the new environmental bill.

Exemplary 90-100% A Thoroughly outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 160 Assignment 2: Planning Negotiations Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Outline a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate. Weight: 30% Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapter 1-17 for handing he negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate. 2. Insufficiently outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate. Partially outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock, an impasse, or a stalemate.