It was a quick response in order placing making payment and delivering the solution they are very much organised and prompt services... I am very much impressed with the service provided by Expertsmind. Thank you so much for your help. I am contented !!

Part 2 /20 Findings are clearly linked and well justified. Scope and limitations are provided exceptionally well Findings are clearly linked and justified. Scope and limitations are provided Findings are linked and convincing. Some scope and limitations are provided Findings are not linked and unjustified Findings are not available Part 3 /4 All socio-technical aspects are discussed exceptionally well Very good discussion of most socio- technical aspects Good discussion of some socio- technical aspects Discussion of few socio- technical aspects Unsatisfactory discussion of few socio- technical aspects. Conclusion /2 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistent, logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed Reference style /2 Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors

Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction /2 All salient features contributing to the popularity of Ethereum & Bitcoin are discussed and ability to think critically is demonstrated Some relevant features are soundly analysed. General features are analysed. Some relevant features are briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Part 1 /20 Demonstrated excellent ability to analyse critically and sourced reference material Demonstrated excellent ability to analyse critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated some ability to analyse critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated little ability to analyse critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to analyse critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Part 2 Analyse and discuss at least one application EACH supported by Bitcoin in the following domains: • Token Systems • Decentralised File storage There has to be at least 2-3 references for each application. 10* 2 =20 Part 3 Differences and Similarities between Ethereum & Bitcoin are to be discussed and analysed 4 Conclusion Draw a conclusion of the report with complete summary of all sections 2 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style, in text citation and complete reference list. 2 Total 50

Marking Criteria Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Introduction Introduction of Ethereum v/s Bitcoin in terms of use and popularity. Also the structure of the assignment should be discussed. 2 Part 1 Discussion of following aspects related to Ethereum: • Architecture • Features • Challenges 8+ 6+ 6 =20

Please read the given document carefully to provide best quality work and follow all the given instructions with IEEE reference style and plagiarism free work please. Thank you. • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.