Please read the marking criteria before sending it to me. Good quick response to any of the my query. Looks good quality and the expert reads the case and provided a proper response instead of rushing despite needed it after 5 hours of asking for help. Instructions were followed correctly, the assignment is prepared correctly too! Cool.

Research Weighting 20% No authoritative sources, no evidence of research or not relevant for the task. Very limited understanding. The research has not been linked to the main text. Less than 2 authoritative sources or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited understanding. Little evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. 2-3 scholarly sources. Some sources lack relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Adequate understanding. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. 3-4 scholarly sources. Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Good understanding. The research is integrated with the main text. 4-5 scholarly sources. Sources are well- chosen, authoritative and are appropriate for the task. Excellent understanding. The research is very well integrated with the main text.

Organisation/ logic Weighting 5% No flow. No argument. Poorly organised and difficult to read. Does not flow logically from one part to another. The argument is not clear. Generally well organised although the flow of the argument is not always logical. Argument is clear and mostly sound. Coherently organised and logical formation of sound argument. Exceptionally well structured. Logic is easy to follow. Arguments are sound and convincing. Writing Weighting 5% No consideration for presentation. Muddled writing that is very difficult to follow. Numerous grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Acceptable presentation. Long winded and some clear writing presentation. Some grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Tidy presentation. Mostly clear writing but at times long winded. Writing style lacks consideration. Few issues around grammar. Less than 5 spelling errors. Professional presentation. Clear writing mainly to the point. Considered writing style. Excellent grammar with only minor oversights. Less than 3 spelling errors. Polished presentation. Clear and concise writing.

Compare and contrast strategies to manage conflict within a team/group. Selecting and justifying a conflict management strategy. Weighting 25% A conflict management strategy is not selected or described with any clarity. Selected strategy for managing conflict is not explained in any detail. Justification does not make sense. No examples given. Justification of the selected conflict management strategy is inadequate. Example given to justify selection and explain context are unclear. The discussion on the selected conflict management strategies is adequate, but would benefit from more detail and discussion. Examples are adequate. The selected conflict management strategy is well justified. Very useful examples are given to support selection. Shows strength in understanding the practical application of conflict management strategies. The discussion top justify the preferred conflict management strategy is in great depth and the argument is explicit and thought provoking. Points made are insightful and multidimensional.

This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and it makes up 15% of your final result for this paper. The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date. Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) C (50-64) B (65-79) A (80-100) Compare and contrast strategies to manage conflict within a team/group. Describing strategies to manage conflict Weighting 40% Conflict strategies are not discussed with any clarity. Conflict strategies are discussed to some extent. The discussion on conflict strategies lacks clarity. The discussion on the range of conflict strategies to consider is adequate, but would benefit from more detail and discussion. Examples are adequate. The array is conflict management strategies is discussed in depth. A strong understanding on the considerations and context for selection is shown. Some interesting points made. The discussion on conflict management strategies is in great depth and well beyond the obvious. Points made are insightful and multidimensional.