Source 1 Title and Citation:  Students for Concealed Carry on Campus. "College Campuses Are Less Safe Without Concealed Weapons." Gun Violence. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Why Our Campuses Are NOT Safer Without Concealed Handguns." 2008. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2013.

1

Identify the principal issue presented by the source.

2

Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

3

Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

4

Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

5

Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

6

Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

7

State one argument made by the author.

8

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

9

Is the author's argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

10

Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.

Source 2 Title and Citation: Maxwell, Bill. "EFFECTIVE LEADERS ACT ON FACTS, NOT EMOTIONS." Tampa Bay Times [St. Petersburg, FL] 30 Dec. 2012: 3P. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2013DocumentURLhttps://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ic/ovic/NewsDetailsPage/NewsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=News&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CA313689477&userGroupName=uphoenix_uopx&jsid=ba601dc7573925d79d0ca85b7454970c

1

Identify the principal issue presented by the source.

2

Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

3

Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

4

Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

5

Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

6

Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

7

State one argument made by the author.

8

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

9

Is the author's argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

10

Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.

Source 3 Title and Citation: Day, Theodore, Craig Pirrong, and Stan Liebowitz. "Concealed Weapons Should Be Allowed on College Campuses." Concealed Weapons. Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. At Issue. Rpt. from "Guns Make Colleges Safer." Gun Owners of America. 2009. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2013. https://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%

1

Identify the principal issue presented by the source.

2

Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

3

Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

4

Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

5

Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

6

Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

7

State one argument made by the author.

8

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

9

Is the author's argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

10

Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.

Source 4 Title and Citation: Students for Gun Free Schools. "College Campuses Are Safer Without Concealed Weapons." Gun Violence. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Why Our Campuses Are Safer Without Concealed Handguns." 2010. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2013.

Document URL
https://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&currPage=&disableHighlighting=false&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010223251&userGroupName=uphoenix_uopx&jsid=5da489556878edb7ffe4e429ba9dde51

1

Identify the principal issue presented by the source.

2

Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

3

Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

4

Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.

5

Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

6

Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.

7

State one argument made by the author.

8

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

9

Is the author's argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

10

Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.