Emphasizing areas in which project has been poorly managed and areas where main stakeholders have failed to exercise their responsibilities /5 Excellent use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made Potential risks (costs, show stoppers)/5 All elements are present and very well integrated. Originality and expected outcomes. Coverage and use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing and effort made. /5 All elements are present and very well integrated. Quality of writing Clarity & Conciseness & Overall presentation /5 All elements are present and very well integrated.

Clear executive summary, introduction and logical structure./5 All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Having well focused and understanding key stakeholder roles and responsibilities. Demonstrating Project Management knowledge./5 All elements are present and very well integrated. Emphasizing the importance of post-project review, identifying the areas of expert advice and critical lesson learned./10 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Use of the subject material (including literature, theories cited & applied to support the ideas). Use of Research, interpretation & the connections to the topic being presented. /10 All elements are present and very well integrated.

Executive summary, introduction, logical structure and conclusion. Executive summary, table of contents, introduction, logical flow of information for the given case study and conclusions. Report on current project status Identify what went wrong in the case study, and report your assessment of the current project. Structure of the report Report structure based on certain project management methods such as project scope creeps and risk analysis. Project assessment vs project management practices Comparison of project assessment from the case study and project management practices Recommendations on project closer and future improvements Recommendations on steps to close the project and improvements for the future projects. Reference style IEEE Poor writing Inadequate structure, careless presentation, or the report exceeds the word limit by more or less than 10%