Reference no: EM13777250
Brief a Case
Case Title: Mrs. Jenkins Vs the Taxicab Company
The Facts of the Case: A taxi driver working for the Taxi Company now the defendant in this case, jumped from the taxi when an armed thief entered the taxi demanding to be driven away while being pursued by his victim. The taxi driver left the cab while it was still running and it subsequently ran up and hits the plaintiff Mrs. Jenkins and his two children.
Proceedings below: In this case, the plaintiff filed suit for negligence, alleging that the interest of the public at large should be protected from being threatened by an unattended vehicle. The plaintiff argued that the life of pedestrians is more important than the right of a driver who saved his own life by leaving the car unattended. However, the Courts of appeals have so far dismissed such reasoning's arguing that personal instincts and the law of nature permits the driver to behave in that manner in such a situation.
The Questions before the court: In such a complicated circumstance, the court must determine whether the law holds in an emergency situation to the same degree of judgment that is required of some person under circumstances where he or she has an opportunity for deliberate action.
Holding: In a similar case between Cordas Vs Peerless Transportation Company, the court held, a decision to dismiss the complaint. Likewise, in this scenario, the defendant cannot be held liable since the circumstance at hand could not allow the driver to risk his life.
Reasoning: Holding the defendant liable under the facts within this case would be abolishing the primal law of nature created within each individual. Additionally, the driver has a right to secure himself from harm given the human instincts.
Important Concurrence: The Supreme Court concurred to the fact that the defendant did not act negligibly but rather within his ordinary conscious. Consequently, the motion to dismiss the complaint was upheld. Therefore, the cab company is not liable for the damages that Mrs. Jenkins incurred (Rumsey, 2009).
Dissenting: None of importance.
How would you defend this action
: The complaint stated that the book violated the States' statute against deceptive advertising because it advances a claim that the Beardtown Ladies earned a "23.4% annual return" on investments using the investment methods described in the book. ..
|
Order-picking versus stock-replenishing functions
: How might the storage of hazardous materials affect the design of a warehousing facility?
|
Contract between roy and melissa
: Assuming that there was no contract between Roy and Melissa, does Roy have any basis for recovery as a result of his losing the right to manufacture and distribute the doll
|
List the major assumptions underlying social labeling
: 1. List the major assumptions underlying Social Labeling theories of delinquency. Identify and discuss two (2) prominent sociologists and their concepts and contributions to the Social Labeling approach. What are some of the weaknesses and limitation..
|
Case - mrs jenkins vs the taxicab company
: Case Title: Mrs. Jenkins Vs the Taxicab Company, The Facts of the Case: A taxi driver working for the Taxi Company now the defendant in this case, jumped from the taxi when an armed thief entered the taxi demanding to be driven away while being pur..
|
Warehouse management system issues
: What is a warehouse management system (WMS)? What are the benefits and downfalls of a WMS in a warehousing operation?
|
Socialization has far more impact on a person than biologic
: 1. Explain the following statement: Studies have shown that socialization has far more impact on a person than biological predisposition. 2. Identify a role that you currently hold. How have the agents of socialization, specific to you, placed you in..
|
Discuss where nhs would fall on a technological acceptance
: Develop an annotated bibliography containing ten references that can be used to evaluate five potential technological solutions for the scenario.
|
Role of ethics and social responsibility in developing
: Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan while considering stakeholder needs and agendas.
|