5. Excellent Good OK Needs Work Poor Some of your output was OK. However, you have a number of mistakes. Generally poor analysis with either numerous errors or incorrect techniques used or missing results. Poor organisation of output. 12 0 Correct formulae used,calculations correct and answer statements correct. Most of the analysis was of a high standard. Perhaps some small mistakes. Some of the analysis was well done. However you have made a number of mistakes.

4. Excellent Good OK Needs Work Poor 20 0 Both confidence intervals correct and graph correct.Correct conclusion reached Most of the analysis was of a high standard. Perhaps some small mistakes. Some of the analysis was well done. However there were either a few errors in your analysis OR you had missing analysis. Some of your output was OK. However, you may have used inappropriate techniques to analyse the data. Generally poor analysis with either numerous errors or incorrect techniques used or missing results. Poor organisation of output.

3. Excellent Good OK Needs Work Poor 21 0 Hypothesis testing process correct and correct conclusion reached Most of the analysis was of a high standard. Some of your output may have contained small mistakes or could be improved. Results were well organised. Some of the analysis was well done. However there were either a few errors in your analysis OR you had missing analysis. Some of your output was OK. However, you have made a number of mistakes or have missing results. Organisation of output may need improvement. Generally poor analysis with either numerous errors or incorrect techniques used or missing results. Poor organisation of output.

2. Excellent Good OK Needs Work Poor Hypothesis testing process correct and correct conclusion reached Most of the analysis was of a high standard. Some of your output may have contained small mistakes or could be improved. Results were well organised. Some of the analysis was well done. However there were either a few errors in your analysis OR you had missing analysis. Some of your output was OK. However, you have made a number of mistakes or have missing results. Organisation of output may need improvement. Generally poor analysis with either numerous errors or incorrect techniques used or missing results. Poor organisation of output. 0 21

Available Allocated 1. Excellent Good OK Needs Work Poor Both answer statements correct and all calculations correct. Most of the analysis was of a high standard. Some of your output may have contained small mistakes or could be improved. Results were well organised. 16 0 Some of the analysis was well done. However there were either a few errors in your analysis OR you had missing analysis. Some of your output was OK. However, you have made a number of mistakes or have missing results. Organisation of output may need improvement. Generally poor analysis with either numerous errors or incorrect techniques used or missing results. Poor organisation of output.

Your submission will comprise two (2) parts: • Part 1: Data Analysis (max. 8 pages) • Part 2 : Report (max. 2 pages). Both parts may be contained in a single file, but their content must be separated. That is, you will submit one pdf adobe acrobat file OR a word document file. Failure to separate Part 1 and Part 2 will be penalised. Furthermore, marks will be deducted for each part where the page limit is exceeded. The Assignment must be submitted both, i. electronically and ii. in print format by the due date. o 10% of available marks will be deducted if the assignment is only submitted in one format. Electronic submission: There will be a link in Moodle under the Resources and Assessment section labelled “Assignment 2 Online Submission”.

• The report is to be written as a standalone document (that is, assume for the scenario that the manager will only read your report, and not look at your analysis output). • Avoid use of technical words and do not include formulas etc in your memorandum. • When writing your reply, make sure that you provide the information the manager requested in her letter to you. That is, answer the manager’s questions. • Number your answers in your report 1, 2 a, … etc., to match the sequence of the manager’s requests. Using a similar template for your response is a good starting point. • Include an introduction at the start of the report and a summary/conclusion at the end. • Marks will be deducted for the use of technical terms, poor grammar, awkward sentence structure, poor spelling and punctuation, irrelevant material, poor presentation/organisation and letters that are over two (2) pages long.

For the electronic submission there will be a link in Moodle in the Resources and Assessment section. As for Assignment 1, the maximum number of pages for the analysis is 8 and for the report is 2 pages. GENERAL GUIDELINES: • Before doing any analysis, classify all your variables as either numerical or categorical. The techniques you will use depend on the type of data you have. • As mentioned above, the analysis section (Part 1) you submit should be no more than 8 pages of workings. This can be hand written so long as it is legible. • Your analysis should be presented in the same sequence as the manager’s questions, and everything should be clearly labelled and grouped around each question. • You can provide an excel check, but this should be in conjunction with the manual computations using appropriate formula.

Please do check thoroughly through the document as there are "HINTS" that are provided by the lecturer, under the questions (Scroll to the bottom). I will be attaching the lectures that will be of help as well. 1. The solution should be plagiarism free and fulfil all the given requirements. 2. In case plagiarism found is more than 15%, we would have to deduct 50% of this order amount. 3. In case of technical order, share the screenshots also. 4. In case order is delivered after due date, penalty of 30% would be applied. 5. In case requirements seems incomplete, please login to your account and check message section..