Reference no: EM131682149

Question: New Castle Doctrine: Right to Defend or License to Kill? Marion Hammer, executive director of Unifi ed Sportsmen of Florida, representative of the National Rifl e Association in Florida: When you are prosecuting law-abiding people for defending themselves against criminals, it's wrong and it has to be fi xed. And the castle doctrine laws fi xed that. Gregory Hicks, Warren City attorney: I believe in protecting one's property. I believe in the fact that your home is your castle. But I don't believe you have the right to use that kind of deadly force on a prank. I'm sorry, that's not the way an ordered society acts. Dan Rather, Dan Rather Reports: To shoot or not to shoot? For even the most seasoned police offi cer, it's the ultimate dilemma. A split-second choice that could prevent a violent crime or be a fatal mistake. But it's no longer just police who are deciding whether or not to pull the trigger. There's a new breed of laws that's expanding the rights of civilians to use deadly force. They are called the "castle doctrine" laws, and since 2005, they've been passed or proposed in more than 35 states. The new laws are not about the right to bear arms, but the right to use them. The National Rifl e Association says the castle doctrine is restoring a tradition of self-defense that dates back to medieval England, when a man's home was considered his castle. But others say these laws are ushering in a violent new era where civilians may have more freedom to use deadly force than even the police.

Instructions: 1. Go to the website www.cengage.com/criminaljustice/samaha.

2. Read the transcript of the report on the new castle laws.

3. List the arguments for the proposition that the new castle doctrine laws represent a right to defend guaranteed by the Constitution.

4. List the arguments for the proposition that the new castle doctrine laws represent a license to kill.

5. Write a one-page essay stating what you believe best balances the right to defend yourself while protecting the lives of innocent people. Explain how your position represents the most ethical public policy regarding the right to bear arms. Back up your answer with the selections you read and with the New Castle Doctrine sections in your text.