Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Question: The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) waives the federal government's sovereign immunity concerning claims arising out of torts committed by federal employees. Therefore, the government generally can be sued for tort claims based on wrongful actions by federal employees. However, there are exceptions to this waiver of sovereign immunity. Where an exception applies, a tort claim cannot be brought against the government. One of the exceptions to the sovereign immunity waiver is set forth in FTCA § 2680(c). This exception is for "any claim arising in respect of the assessment or collection of any tax or customs duty, or the detention of any property by any officer of customs or excise or any other law enforcement officer."
When a prisoner was transferred from a federal prison in Georgia to another federal prison in Kentucky, he noticed that several items of religious and nostalgic significance were missing from his bags of personal property, which had been shipped to the new facility by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP). Alleging that FBOP officers had lost his property, petitioner filed suit under the FTCA. The district court dismissed the claim, concluding that it was barred by § 2680(c) and its broad reference to "any other law enforcement officer." The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed. In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the prisoner's argument that the statutory phrase "any officer of customs or excise or any other law enforcement officer" applies only to officers enforcing customs or excise laws and not to the FBOP officers (who obviously were not acting as enforcers of customs or excise laws). The prisoner appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. In rejecting the prisoner's argument, did the Eleventh Circuit correctly interpret § 2680(c)?
The assignment in Law deals with the topic "Legal Environment of Business". A case study about Mary, a newly joined employee who is working in the USA and Europe. She faces few issues at her work place in Europe and tries to talk to her manager who s..
This assignment is about the concept of Business Ethics & Legal Issues. The laws relating to these can be found in Antitrust laws. These laws are concerned with those large corporations which have a majority of market share, mergers and acquisitions.
Examples of securities that are exempted from the registration provisions of the 1933 Act and involving misstatement of material facts in a prospectus.
With the aid of a decided cases, discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation contract.
It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on individuals.
Company Law, Application of Law to Facts and Conclusion.
This assignment related to business law.
Answer all the questions under business law.
Iidentify the issue(s) raised by the facts, identify the relevant legal principles, apply the relevant legal principles to the facts, reach a conclusion.
Prepare a report and present an evaluation of the subsequent methodologies for software development in terms of cost, resources and time.
Business value and ethics, Bart agrees to put Sam's Super Bowl champion-ship autographed football in his sports store to sell for $1,500. Sam agrees to pay Bart a 15% commission for selling the ball. If Joe comes in the sports store and offers Bart ..
Advise what tax consequences arise in respect of the payments.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd