Topic is in assignment 2 but it should be slightly different so it could be like " URBAN POPULATION: EXISTING TRAVEL PRACTICES ON PARRAMATTA REGION AND CYCLING AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON ROAD SAFETY" The research is done on city of Sydney, Adelaide and most of the parts of Europe, i guess its not been done in Parramatta region, it its already been done have to find some other busy part: The reference articles should be peer reviewed only, high quality materials like journal articles should be referred to and some research that can be done in 3 month of time by an individual should be considered, turntin check is done on the submission of assignment so care should be taken.

The assignment is 10 pages excluding the reference works. i have attached additional criteria’s in this email. Could i receive draft on Wednesday evening so i could show it to the supervisor on Friday, the major bodies like literature review, research question, theoretical content, experimental setup, result outcome, Gantt chart, to be done earlier. The following is the comment I received for the assignment 2, which might need to be considered in the third assignment, I am attaching additional requirements in this email, please check above for the template and previous assignment. Considering the criteria in assignment 2 and the topic i have send, the project proposal and topic can be further modified (Not totally different). Thank you.

Clear and concise, consistency present in summarising the project, aims, findings and conclusions between executive summary and the entire project proposal. Clearly articulates the need to undertake the research. Presents the critical details of project area with concise description of project. Critically reviews existing work, identifies relevant research areas and any opposing views. Links to the gap the project will fill, all the reference material is consistent with the research gap addressed. Identifies a precise and measurable research question relevant to student’s area of study, aims are non-repetitive, seamlessly integrated, showing clearly articulated understanding over the steps to meet aim and tangible sub-goals.

Identifies clear theoretical basis for work e.g. hypothesis, theoretical approach/es. Non-repetitive discussion seamlessly integrated where appropriate. Shows impact of theory on project steps. Identifies experimental lab and/or field set-up linked to project aims and sub-goals. Clear and concise discussion of potential limitations and problems in undertaking experiments. and how the activities planned lead to producing evidence necessary. Clear explanation of data linked to lab and/or field set up. Identifies the variables and parameters and type of results to be investigated with suitable data analysis. Makes projection of outcome and shows relevance of outcome to project objectives. Contains a transformed list of sub-goals into a schedule of work using a Gantt Chart showing: three key review points, milestones and deliverables. The plan is well integrated and consistent with the remaining of the project proposal. Planning timelines and activity evaluation considered.

Clear conclusion, long term impact. Consistency with remaining of document. List of references is broad: covers topic well, contains a mix of articles with current state of the art. Carefully considered content; thorough; very well- articulated; broad and rich in depth. Equal and consistent for each (addressing the task) component. Grammar and spelling mostly used well, not distracting the reader.