Reference no: EM131808666

1. The Races bought a mobile home from Fleetwood Retail Corp. They had a lot in mind, but Fleetwood convinced them to buy a lot from it, telling the Races that lots were scarce, others were looking, and it would be off the market, Fleetwood assured the Races it had checked with a contractor regarding the feasibility of putting the trailer on the lot. When the Races' contractor tried to get a septic permit, it was denied because the lot was too small for their trailer: it turned out to be smaller than Fleetwood represented. The Races sued for breach of the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. Explain why they should or should not be successful.

2. The Taylors bought an ocean front lot in oregon. The next year, Staley bought an ocean front lot south of the Taylors and built a home on it. Over the years, Staley often expressed concern that when the Taylors built their house, they could block her view. They said they would not. When they began planning their home, they asked Staley to submit a letter in support of a setback variance they sought. She said she would as long asher view wasn’t block. They again told her it wouldn’t be block. When the house was built, it partially blocked her view. She sued for breach of an implied contract. Can an implied contract be inferred from the parties' conduct? Explain.

3. Golf-Hamel, an employee of Hastings Family Planning Services was 11 years, was asked Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C. (O&G) to come work for them. She accepted and agreed to start work two months later. She gave notice at hasting and got fitted for uniforms at O&G. The day before she was told not to come to work because one of the wives of an O&G owner objective to her hiring. Golf-Hamel sued for promissory estoppel. Will she be successful? why?