Reference no: EM13815513
Your manufacturing company is currently producing just enough of its best-selling Awesome Gadget X to me this year’s demand. The fore cast for the next year is in, and its demand is expected to double (1 million new units per yr.) and stay at this level for the next 3 years. To handle the new 1 million units, your company can scrounge enough extra equipment and use current labor to handle most of the new parts and the final assembly. However, one part, Super Sick Feature Y (one needed in each unit), is at maximum production with your current equipment. Thus, you must either 1)acquire new equipment and new operators to make these critical parts yourself or 2) contract with a 3rd party company, Evil Sell out Corpation Z, to buy the parts at a fixed rate over 3 years and have them delivered to your facility for final assembly. If your company's interest rate is 10% determine how much it will cost per part to make them yourself, and the decide whether or not you should buy the parts from the 3rd party at $3.75/part. be sure to clearly show your work and you answers to the dilemma.
Given
Cost to buy parts from 3rd part-$3.75 per part
Initial capital investment for equipment- $6,000,000
Annual operation & maintenance for equipment- $1,000,000
Annual Labor Cost for new employees- $500,000
Raw material cost for additional parts- $0.30 per part
Salvage value at year 3 of new equipment- $1,000,000
Fraction of any change in income will survive the leakage
: If import spending were the ONLY leakage from an economy and the marginal propensity to import is one-third, what fraction of any change in income will survive the leakage and go on to start the next round of spending?
|
Multiplier depends upon the fraction of any change in income
: The multiplier, or the change in equilibrium GDP that will occur per any change in spending, can be determined by calculating the fraction of any change in income that survives all of the leakages and goes on to start the next round of spending.
|
Useless to the economy to increase government expenditures
: Assume an open, mixed economy (C + I + G + X = real GDP) and an MPS of .2. Explain if it would be expansionary, contractionary, or useless to the economy to increase government expenditures by $50 billion and also increase taxes by $50 billion.
|
Determine the number of our devoted to work and leisure
: Suppose that trade off between work N and leisure L for a constant level of utility of 200 is expressed as u(n, L) = NL or 200= NL the budget constraint is l =24-w/P)N for a wage rate of w/P=4 determine the number of our devoted to work and leisure
|
Best-selling awesome gadget
: Your manufacturing company is currently producing just enough of its best-selling Awesome Gadget X to me this year’s demand. The fore cast for the next year is in, and its demand is expected to double (1 million new units per yr.) and stay at this le..
|
Strong supporter of free trade-international trade policy
: If you were a strong supporter of free trade and in charge of U.S. international trade policy, would you cut tariffs and quotas, or would you negotiate with the nation's trading partners, maintaining trade barriers unless they lowered theirs also? Di..
|
Distort trade according to comparative advantage
: A subsidy on exports is, in a sense, the opposite of a tariff on imports. If a tariff lowers efficiency, would you expect a subsidy to increase efficiency or lower it? How do tariffs and subsidies compare in the way they distort trade according to co..
|
What is the present worth of the planned expenditures
: A construction company in Kurdistan expects to spend $4,000 two years later, $8,000 three years from now, and $6,250 six years from now. What is the present worth of the planned expenditures if the interest rate remains 11.8% per year? Use standard n..
|
What is the equivalent annual worth of this bonus
: A supermarket wants to allocate 1.75% as bounce to reward the hardworking employees from the total that will be made annually. The sales are expected to be $250,180 in the first year and $262,180 in the second year. The amount increases each year by ..
|