Reference no: EM132602168 , Length: word count:1000

BA313 Auditing - Melbourne Institute of Technology

Case study in discussing the legal responsibilities of the Auditor

Learning Outcome 1: Explain and apply the principles, practice and process of auditing to practical situations.

Learning Outcome 2: Compare and contrast the organisation's and the auditor's responsibilities for an audit.

Learning Outcome 3: Explain the importance of planning an audit and distinguish the steps involved.

Learning Outcome 4: Identify and critically evaluate the risks inherent in an audit.

Assessment Task Description

In addition to the Submission Guidelines appearing on page 1, the assignment is to be completed individually. The submission into the specific assignment drop box in Moodle is to be made by each student individually.

This assignment is comprised is a single academic paper discussing a case, and is marked out of 20marks.

The marking rubric below sets out the requirements:

Principally you will be marked on four components:

(1) What happened with regards to LM including why LM was audited given its nature and the law covering which organisations require an audit.
(2) Legal issues both from a statue perspective (corporate law) and other legal issues.
(3) Ethical issues
(4) Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research

As mentioned above, the assessmentshould be presented in an academic paper format.

A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit).

Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. Make sure to include the relevant heading.

Required:
Discuss the underlying reasons behind the appearance at the Company Auditors Discipline board of Reginald Williams.

Attachment:- auditing assignment.rar