Are opinions and facts clearly separated

Reference no: EM133007729

Question 1: Are opinions and facts clearly separated? Give examples.

Question 2: Is this memo convincing? If you were the one reading the memo and had the decision-making power, would this memo persuade you? Why?

Question 3: What else would you include in this memo if you were the writer?

Reference no: EM133007729

Questions Cloud

Does the memo use jargon and technical information : Evaluate the Format and Style of the Memo Is the memo written in active or passive voice? Give an example. Does the memo use jargon and technical information?

Evaluate the components and structure of the memo : Is the memo header properly formatted i.e. does it include all the components that need to be included in a memo (from:, to: date, subject, and so on)?

Determine the amount of the first payment taxpayer : Taxpayer purchased an annuity from an insurance company that promised to pay her $2,100 per month for 15 years. Determine amount of the first payment Taxpayer

Evaluate the content of the memo : Do the authors offer supporting arguments for their recommendations? If so, give an example of how the argument supports a recommendation.

Are opinions and facts clearly separated : Is this memo convincing? If you were the one reading the memo and had the decision-making power, would this memo persuade you? Why?

Application of succinct analytical and reflective skills : Annotated Bibliography Assessment - Critically analyse texts and/or multimedia material in both a business and academic context.

What were territorial dispute between china and philippiness : What were the territorial disputes between China and Philippines, which brought up to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea?

What level of government should regulate the issues : What level of government should regulate these issues? Are decisions on these issues better placed in the hands of the states or of the federal government? Why?

Should the first amendment be interpreted strictly : Should the First Amendment be interpreted strictly so that no one's rights are infringed by government sponsorship of religion - or should it be

User Account

All Pages