Description Weight Provide clear statement of problem being solved 25% Problem statement is nonexistent or missing primary elements. No protagonist is identified. Student does not idennly key issues:root causes. Provide in-depth analysis with accurate use of course concepts in explaining the problem 40% Paper lacks depth of arguments appropriate for assignment. Lacante me of some of course oncepts. Analysis is primarily based on opinion rather than data. Provide a range of relevant, detailed recommendations20% Write in a clear in a professional manner 15%

Recommendations clearly follow the logic of the analysis. Implementation is thorough to the degree allowed by case data Recorrnenditions are focused and actionable by the protagonist. Actions are based on a clear understanding of the concepts of the course and their application. The rangetariety of recommendations indicates a strong level of critical thinking. Format follows the requirements of the assignment The author's writing is consistent and easy to follow. Writer uses a vocabulary and voice appropriate for gadwite level writing Gramme: and spelling show the effort of the writer in proofreading and polishing the final paper.

Format follows most of the requirements of the assipment Overall writing is good, however there are sections in the case that can be challenging to follow. There are also too many stucturallorpnizational issues and or grammatical errors for 3 graduate level paper. Excellent 9041+ - 10044 States problem presented in the case accurately and concisely. Statement includes all of the elements set forth in the assignment Protagonist is accurately identified and direction of the paper is clear. Key issues, analytical points, and root causes are clearly identified. Analyses represent direct connections to the problem statements, key issues, and analytical points. Author shows an in depth understanding of concept application. The logic of the analysis is data-based. and appropriate analytical tools are used to evaluate and or derive alternatives.

Case Study Rubric Problem statement is nearly accurate but still a little =clear. Includes most elements of the assignment Protagonist may not be accurately identified. Room for incprovernent in terms of identifying of key issues, analytical points and root causes. There is room for improvement in terms of making connections between the problem statement analysis, alternatives. and sohnions. Expand the degree to which analyses critically eruptiv, alternatives using appropriate tools. and or the degree to which root cause analysis is used to generate alternatives. Finally. some arguments need to be better supported with data. analysis, and logo. Expand the rangetariety of alternative reco=endations. There is room for improvement in terms of a balanced. critical examimtion of alternatives leading to a final solution set. Solutions consider root came andor are examined using appropriate acumen Better address key assumptions in analyses and recommendations. Also. implemenation recommendations may not be realistic even case data.