Reference no: EM133448157
PHilosophy of Animals
Advice: Write as if your reader was an undergraduate student, smart, but not familiar with the ideas and papers you are discussing.
• Be concise and informative: each sentence should have the purpose of saying something - no repetition, no filling
• Create different sections for the parts of the essay and different paragraphs for the different
points that you are addressing
• Be sure to include an introduction. An introduction should do the following:
o Introduce the reader to the topic. That is, explain in general terms
what the topic is, what the issue(s) is(are), and why the reader should care
about it.
o Introduce the reader to what will be done in the essay: explain briefly what will be the different parts of the essay, that is, provide a roadmap
• Make sure the structure of your paper matches the roadmap provided in the introduction
• Cite all sources using both in-text citations and a works cited page.
The overall aim of this essay is to reflect critically on the non-anthropocentric positions that have been discussed in class: based on the non-anthropocentric positions that we have discussed, identify some features (1 or 2) that you think such a position should have, and explain why, and identify some features (1 or 2) that you think such a position should rather NOT have and explain why. By 'feature' I mean whatever claim, rule or principle is part of one of the non-anthropocentric positions we discussed, like recognizing rights to some animals who satisfy specific conditions, recognizing rights to all animals or to species, the rule of non-maleficence etc. The selection and discussion of the features must make explicit and clear reference to the author of the position this feature is part of and explain this feature.
Assignment description: Based on the lectures and readings, compose an essay discussing the following
questions:
- What are the main features that distinguish anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric positions?
- What are one or two characteristics (like, recognizing intrinsic value to all living beings or recognizing intrinsic value only to sentient beings, having a principle of noninterference etc...) that you believe a non-anthropocentric position should rather not have?
Specify, for each of these characteristics, which non-anthropocentric position seen in
class does include this feature and why you believe it is a problematic one. Include
reference to the author and publication presenting/discussing this position.
- What are one or two characteristics (like, recognizing intrinsic value to all living beings or recognizing intrinsic value only to sentient beings, having a principle of noninterference etc...) that you believe a non-anthropocentric position should have?
Specify, for each of these characteristics, which non-anthropocentric position seen in
class already does include this feature and why you believe it is a valuable one. Include reference to the author and publication presenting/discussing this position.
- How do you apply your position, made of the rejection or endorsement of the features discussed in your essay, with respect to other forms of life to everyday life?