For this incredible work, I thank you to the whole team of EXPERTSMIND. In this entire journey, tutors were available for my assignment. Quality wise also, it was to the mark and my teachers were also impressed with the job. Thank you again, team !!

All format elements are correct. All format elements are correct. • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion 5.0 No reference page is included. No citations are used. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

5.0 Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion

5.0 Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

8.0 Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis chanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion

7.0 Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction

5.0 None of the required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable. esis Development and Purpose

35.0 A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change is either missing or not evident to the reader. A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change is present but cursory and lacking in depth. A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. Two Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations.

An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is thoroughly presented and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary elements. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes a discussion of all necessary Discussion of How To Determine if an Organization Is Structurally Ready to Support Change

Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion Paper Format 7.0 Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim

An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is either missing or not evident to the reader. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is either missing or not evident to the reader. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is present but incomplete or inaccurate. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is present but incomplete or inaccurate. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is presented but is cursory and lacking in depth. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed is presented but is cursory and lacking in depth.

• Add criteria group after this one • Add criteria group above this one • Add criterion • Delete criteria group Criteria • Add criteria group after this one • Add criteria group above this one • Add criterion • Delete criteria group 100.0 • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion Analysis of the Factors Used to Determine If Change Is Needed • Add criterion after this one • Add criterion above this one • Delete criterion 30.0

Assignment will be based on the following criteria for grading. Criteria Achievement Levels Description Percentage Unsatisfactory • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level 0.00 % • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level % Less than Satisfactory • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level 74.00 % • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level % Satisfactory • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level 79.00 % • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level % Good • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level 87.00 % • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level % Excellent • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level 100.00 % • Add a level after this one • Add a level before this one • Delete level %