Reference no: EM131312391

Comp 7/ Bio 40 Project: Reliability of Metagenomics Reads

Background

In this class, we are studying 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing, in which the sequences read come from one of the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA genes, which are generally well conserved across prokaryotes. Because of the variability in the region we are sequencing, it is possible to use computational means to try to identify the taxonomic classi?cation of each sequence read. Of course, the sequence data can be noisy; noise may be represented by nucleotides reported as 'N' in the sequence data ?les. In addition, not every bacterial species has previously been sequenced, and some species may have suf?ciently similar sequences even in these hypervariable regions, making it dif?cult to classify them exactly.

The MiSeq metagenomics pipeline uses the method of Wang et al. (Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Q. Wang, G. M. Garrity, J. M. Tiedje, J. R. Cole. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73(16):5261, 2007) to taxonomically classify sequences. This is a probabilistic method, so the classification at each level of the taxonomic hierarchy is associated with a confidence score, which corresponds roughly to an estimate of the probability that the classification is correct.

The software uses a cutoff of 80% confidence to report a result. If the classification software is less than 80% confident in its classification at any given taxonomic level, it reports that the sequence is "Unclassified" at that level. Some samples have many unclassified reads, while others have relatively few.

Hypothesis

We are going to focus on the most specific level of taxonomic classification reported by our software, the genus level. Our hypothesis is the reads that could not be classified with greater than 80% certainty at the genus level had a higher percentage of undetermined nucleotides (Ns). In this assignment, you will analyze next-generation sequencing data to confirm or refute this hypothesis.

Overview

You will write a python program to address this question by combining data from two data files produced by the MiSeq software. We will help you design the program and will even give you the outline of the code to start with, but you will fill in each of the pieces!

In order to test your hypothesis, you will need to extract information from a data file to determine which reads are "unclassified" at the genus level, and which are not. You will also need to get the actual nucleotide sequences reported for each of those reads. These are stored in separate data files, so you will have to match the data up between two files using the read identifiers.

Matching data between two files is a very common problem in bioinformatics, and it is one that is easily solved using the dictionary data structure that you have recently learned. First we will describe the two file formats you will encounter, and then we will describe the program you will need to complete.

Skeleton Code Overview

At the top of the skeleton code, there are two constants: CLASS_FILE and READS_FILE. Add the names of the classification file and the FASTQ file in quotation marks to each of these constants, respectively. Make sure that these files are located in the same directory as the code.

The classification file is called metagen.txt and the fastq file, metagen.fastq. Both are available for download from the projects page. There should also be smaller sample files for use when you are testing your code. The code is initially set to use just the smallest of these (rand_10.txt and rand_10.fasta). Only replace these file names with the names of the larger test files and, eventually, the full sized files, after you get your code to work on the smaller data sets.

Now take a look at the main function in the skeleton code. It performs the following steps:

1. It uses the readInClasses function to create a dictionary classes that maps read IDs to their corresponding classification strings (a string containing the line from the classification file that contains the taxonomic classifications and their confidence scores for that read).

2. Using classes, it creates a dictionary classified, that maps the read IDs to a boolean value, either True or False, depending on whether the confidence in the classification of that read ID at the genus level is above or equal to the constant CUTOFF (set to 0.8), in which case the value for the read ID in classified is True, and False otherwise.

3. Create one more dictionary, reads, mapping read IDs to a string containing the nucleotide sequence for that read from the FASTQ file.

4. This step is the heart of your calculation. Using the two dictionaries, classified and reads, the findAvgNCount() function should go through each read id that is a key of classified, and calculate the percent N's for the corresponding read. Define two lists, one for the classified ids and the other for the unclassified ids. Add the float representing the percent N's to one of the two lists depending on whether the value for the read id in classified is True or False (i.e., whether the read for the id is classified at the genus level or not).

Now use the helper function avgList() to average the values in each list, and return a list that contains just the two averages.

5. Finally, the report function nicely prints the values returned by the previous step.

Download another file using this link:

?https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxpmhtrwfuz9l24/metagen.txt?dl=0

Attachment:- Assignment.rar