a) Provide a critical of the principal operations tasks to satisfy these criteria b) Analyse the process strategies and procedures employed to ensure that these tasks are carried as effectively providing such analysis with appropriate theoretical underpinning. c) Provide a critical evaluated reflection of the Value-Added contribution you have made to your chosen case study as a result your application of operations management principles and related knowledge. i attached some "bachelor" level operation management work and please notice this assignment is master level. 29562066_1WhatsApp Image 20 at 171551.jpeg 29562034_2Project Management Calculation - Chan Wai Leng.xlsx Thanks for your help on this assignment help..

how about M&S specifically in Hong Kong or Asia? 1. Please make use the annual report to report some exact figures to be more practical 2. add graph and charts What is the expected outcome in revenue and profit if the recommendations is implemented? any diagram for the flow of operation, etc? 2915K(i just mark for my reference)

Reminder 1. Need to use real case study and have deep analysis 2. According to my past experience in your team’s work in operation management, over simple and only use theories to answer, but this course needs practical and in depth analysis The expert please suggest which companies that he or she is most confident in

1. Please make use the annual report to report some exact figures to be more practical 2. add graph and charts 1. Need to use real case study and have deep analysis 2. According to my past experience in your team’s work in operation management, over simple and only use theories to answer, but this course needs practical and indepth analysis

at least 20 academic reference, harvard referencing let me know which organization to choose before starting to work - Knowledge outcomes K1 Explain and interpret the systematic nature of the Operations Management function. K2 Analyze the contribution made by operations management to corporate strategy. K3 Evaluate the interdependence of the operations function and the other key activities of the organization.

Relevance to the requirements of the assessment may be very intermittent, and may be reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms A limited understanding of a narrow range of material Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion and there may be a lack of clarity and coherence Some evidence of a view starting to be formed but mainly derivative. Numerous deficiencies in expression and presentation; the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic or repetitious style Barely adequate use of literature. Over reliance on material provided by the tutor.

40 – 49% Some correlation with the requirements of the assessment but there is a significant degree of irrelevance Basic understanding of the subject but addressing a limited range of material Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks clear analytical purpose Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoretical mode(s) couched in simplistic terms Sound work which expresses a coherent position only in broad terms and in uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of the topic A simple basic style but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader Evidence of use of appropriate literature which goes beyond that referred to by the tutor. Frequently only uses a single source to support a point. Weak use of quotation

50 – 59% Some attempt to address the requirements of the assessment: may drift away from this in less focused passages Adequate knowledge of a fair range of relevant material, with intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance Significant analytical treatment which has a clear purpose Generally coherent and logically structured, using an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical mode(s) May contain some distinctive or independent thinking; may begin to formulate an independent position in relation to theory and/or practice. Competently written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, with acceptable format Uses a good variety of literature which includes recent texts and/or appropriate literature, including a substantive amount beyond library texts. Competent use of source material.

60 – 69% Directly relevant to the requirements of the assessment A substantial knowledge of relevant material, showing a clear grasp of themes, questions and issues therein Comprehensive analysis - clear and orderly presentation Well supported, focussed argument which is clear and logically structured. Contains distinctive or independent thinking; and begins to formulate an independent position in relation to theory and/or practice. Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style with acceptable format Critical appraisal of up-to- date and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives. Very good use of a wide range of sophisticated source material.

It is not a requirement that a word limit be set but where a limit is set the following penalty for exceeding the limit must be enforced. Where a word-limit is set for a piece of assessed work, the work will be marked in full and the following penalty will be applied: Word limit Exceeds limit by up to 10% No penalty – tolerance band (see below) Exceeds limit by 10.1-20% -5 percentage points Exceeds limit by 20.1-30% -10 percentage points Exceeds limit by 30.1-40% -15 percentage points Exceeds limit by 40.1-50% -20 percentage points Exceeds limit by more than 50% Mark of zero The relevant limit will be stated in the module outline and the module guide/handbook. The handbook must also make clear whether features such as footnotes, contents pages, appendices, bibliographies etc are included or excluded from the word limit. The word count must be stated by the student on the work. This will be used as the basis for calculating the penalty but if there is concern that the word count is inaccurate it will be checked. Falsifying a word count will be classed as academic misconduct under paragraph

Assignment Guidance Notes: Business Report Structure. Size 12 font, spacing 1.5, include word count. Report Presentation Front Sheet – Name / Student Number / Programme / Module / Date / Workshop Tutor Name Table of Contents Introduction Main Body of Report – Analysis of theory and practice related to this organisation or company Conclusion and Recommendations References - 10 to 20 relevant and credible references Appendix – not included in word count See attached Penalty policy document The criteria for grading the assignment will be: The assignment will be graded for individuals on the basis of the specific criteria outlined in the Generic Assessment Criteria (Postgraduate) attached here with the assessment brief.

Notes: The assignment must be presented in a form that complies with the basic conventions of a report format (see Guide to Basic Study Skills). Write your workshop tutor’s name on the front cover of the report and the Sunderland International Business School feedback sheet. Word count – 3000