Instructions: Need detailed data analysis and Report (introduction, results, method and a discussion/conclusion) of 5000 words. I have done a questionnaire and got over 400 replies, but I am just struggling to figure out what to do about it and how to analyse the data. The dissertation is about how the public interpret dog behaviour and temperament and is a 10 000 words assignment. I already have the literature review so what I would need from you would be around 5000 words including introduction, results, method and a discussion/conclusion. The dataset swill be shared post your confirmation.

Supervision and marking - Guidelines for student supervision are described in the Dissertation Module Guide document, but supervisors are allocated a maximum of 6 hours per student (15 mins per week) This time includes preparation, draft reading, email as well as face-to-face contact. This works out at approximately SIX half-hour meetings to be spaced throughout the year. Supervisors are strongly advised to maintain signed tutorial record sheets.

Marking criteria are stated in the Dissertation Module Guide document and the relevant marking forms are accessible from the course Moodle page (Dissertation Final Marks Form). The two markers should agree a mark and provide a short statement of overall feedback. If a mark cannot be agreed then the dissertation should be marked by a third member of staff. If a mark can still not be agreed between the three markers then the thesis should be referred to the Programme Area Manager (n.b. External Examiners should not be involved in this procedure). External examiners will survey an appropriate range of theses to ascertain that marking is being carried out correctly, but are not allowed to alter the marks of individual students.

A high level of originality demonstrated, in project formulation , execution, interpretation, presentation or creative solution. An extremely clear statement of both the research hypotheses and the objectives. An extremely convincing rationale for the project is presented. The material is entirely relevant and a very high level of skill is displayed in presenting the material in a logical and coherent manner throughout. The dissertation adheres to a correct and required format. The writing is extremely clear and precise allowing no ambiguity of meaning. Very correct English usage occurs throughout. All tables and figures are extremely clear, precise and accurately presented; all can be interpreted without needing to refer to the text. An extremely comprehensive survey of the relevant literature is presented and there is evidence that the literature is expertly understood. All external sources of information are correctly and accurately referenced using the Harvard System.

An entirely valid and appropriate methodology employed in relation to the aims of the work and resources available. The potential and limitation of the techniques employed are fully recognised. An extremely impressive amount of data collected; no more data could have realistically been expected. Entirely relevant data sets produced that are replicated and reproducible. The selection and use of secondary data is fully valid and justified. A very thorough and correct analysis of all the data is performed allowing all major effects/trends in the data to be identified and verified. Results interpreted expertly and objectively in relation to the limitations of the methods and data. Very thorough critical comparisons made to other published results in the research area. Evidence of ability to collate information from a variety of sources to aid interpretation and to perceive novel relationships. All relevant conclusions are drawn and justified. There are no unsupported assertions. The potential value of the work is fully explored and manifested in the form of practical recommendations where appropriate.