organisational structure. Acceptable display of suggestions for the improvements in the organisational structure. Acceptable presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence. Acceptable referencing. Generally accurate use of CU Harvard Style. Adequate display of suggestions for the improvements in the organisational structure. Adequate presentation and structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence. Adequate referencing. CU Harvard Style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Made an attempt to suggest improvements in the organisational structure. Poor/weak presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or unacceptable presentation, grammar and spelling, structure is very poor, links to supporting evidence. Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of CU Harvard.

Outstanding display of suggestions for the improvements in the organisational structure. Outstanding presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross- referencing and links to supporting evidence. Presented to a publishable standard. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using the CU Harvard Style Clear display of suggestions for the improvements in the organisational structure. Good presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence. Generally well referenced with correct use of the CU Harvard Style

For a mark of 50-59% For a mark of 40-49% For a mark of ?40% Show an acceptable understanding and use of relevant theories, concepts and practices related to organisational structure. Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices related to Show an adequate understanding of the organisational structure and display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices related to organisational structure. Attempt some analysis and discussion. Made an attempt to complete the tasks. Show little or no understanding of the principles, theories, and practices related to organisational structure. Little or no evidence of analysis.

For a mark of >70% For a mark of 60-69% Provide the organisational structure of the organisation selected and critically analyze the organisational structure by focusing on its strong and weak areas. Suggest improvements in the organisational structure, and justify these changes with relevant theories. Please note that changes suggested should be Demonstrating outstanding knowledge and depth of relevant theories, concepts and practices related to organisational structure. Outstanding analysis of the organisational structure of the organisation selected. Show a clear understanding and good use of relevant theories, concepts and practices related to organisational structure. Clear analysis of the organisational structure of the organisation selected.

? The computer generated report should be in 12, Times New Roman and black and white. Coloured graphs and charts are allowed. Please label diagrams, charts and annexures accordingly. ? You should present your findings • Intended Module Learning Outcomes On completion of the assessment, student shall be able to: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of theoretical concepts of organisation structure and the management practices.

? Around 40% of the report should contain literature review ? You should provide material supported by appropriate citations, references [Refer to Coventry Harvard Referencing guide on Moodle] and appendices to support your report. ? A minimum of five references are expected at this level of study. ? You should provide a word count at the end of each task. ? The report should contain a title, table of contents, introduction (goal and objectives of report, main sources used, structure, etc.), body, conclusion (revealing all findings, directly related to objectives, highlighting challenges of group work), list of references, appendices. ? Adequate referencing (use CU Harvard style of referencing) should be done in the report.