GLO2 Clarity of written argument (out of 30) Expert (clear, concise, convincing, logical flow) argument used throughout the report. Mostly expert (clear, concise, convincing, logical flow) argument used throughout the report. Good argument through most of the report, but lacks clarity and brevity in a few places in the report, and/or sometimes does not flow in a logical manner. Adequate argument in the report, but mostly lacks clarity, brevity and/or logical flow in many places. Inadequate argument in the report because it the argument is unclear, lacks flow and logic, and unnecessarily verbose.

GLO2 Present-ation (out of 10) Expert use of diagrams, tables, lists, heading formats, short paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/ spelling, reference formatting and report structure. Mostly expert use of diagrams, tables, lists, heading formats, short paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/ spelling, reference formatting and report structure. Good use of diagrams, tables, lists, heading formats, short paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/ spelling, reference formatting and/or report structure. Adequate use of diagrams, tables, lists, heading formats, short paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/ spelling, reference formatting and/or report structure. Inadequate diagrams, tables, lists, heading formats, short paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/ spelling, reference formatting and/or report structure.

Pass Fail Adequate eBusiness strategy concept/theory use to identify strategic changes, but analysis is quite superficial, generic and/or incorrect in concept/theory/tools use. Some relevant research, but a lot more is required to support the analysis. Report demonstrates little/no knowledge or use of eBusiness strategy concepts/ theory/tools, knowledge of the organisation. Little or no (relevant) research has been used to support the analysis.

GLOs High Distinction Distinction Credit GLO1&5 Analysis (out of 60) Advanced(company-specific, detailed, expert, original) use of eBusiness strategy concepts/theories and analytical tools to identify strategic changes. Advanced, detailed and highly relevant research was used to support the analysis. Mostly advanced (company-specific, detailed, expert) use of eBusiness strategy concepts/theories and analytical tools to identify strategic changes, but lacks originality. Mostly advanced, detailed and relevant research was used to support the analysis. Good eBusiness strategy concept/theory use to identify strategic changes, but analysis a little superficial, generic and/or incorrect in concept/theory/tools use in a few places. Mostly relevant research was used to support the analysis, but more such research.

Rubric Assignment 1 will be marked out of 100 (and then converted to a mark out of 10 towards the final unit result) using the following feedback/assessment rubric criteria and standards. GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities GLO2: Communication GLO5: Problem solving

• Building evidence of your experiences, skills and knowledge (Portfolio) - Building a portfolio that evidences your skills, knowledge and experience will provide you with a valuable tool to help you prepare for interviews and to showcase to potential employers. There are a number of tools that you can use to build a portfolio. You are provided with cloud space through OneDrive, or through the Portfolio tool in the Cloud Unit Site, but you can use any storage repository system that you like.Remember that a Portfolio is YOUR tool. You should be able to store your assessment work, reflections, achievements and artefacts in YOUR Portfolio. Once you have completed this assessment piece, add it to your personal Portfolio to use and showcase your learning later, when applying for jobs, or further studies. Curate your work by adding meaningful tags to your artefacts that describe what the artefact represents.

• Penalties for late submission:The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. 'Day' means working day for paper submissions and calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.

The report must be one (1) single file, named T1_year_MIS712_surname_assign1 (e.g. T1_2018_MIS712_Liang_ assign1). You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy. When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakinunit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.