It is best platform to do your assignment work. The quality of work is the best. Provide supporting documents and leave the rest on them, they wont let you feel down. This is what I like most in this service. I am scoring good with their help. thanks once more to such good service.

Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.

Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence 10% Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.

Reporting and stakeholder communication 45% Limited knowledge, skill and/or experience in stakeholders and communication management. Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Understands stakeholders and communication management principles and processes. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Identifies key stakeholders and communication processes. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Identifies key stakeholders and communication processes. Articulates appropriate strategies to communicate project risk analysis result with key stakeholders. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the Performs high level of communication and stakeholder analysis. Clearly demonstrates effective strategies to communicate results of the project risk analysis with a range of key stakeholders. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence,

Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Critical analysis of project risks and development of a range of strategies to manage those risks 45% Fails to analyse project risks and/or develop strategies to manage those risks Minimal analysis of project risks and development of strategies to manage those risks Demonstrates limited awareness of risks and risk management strategies Analyses project risks and develops strategies to manage those risks Demonstrates a capacity to explain risks and risk management strategies Presents a coherent and detailed analysis of project risks and develops a range of strategies to manage those risks Well demonstrated capacity to explain risks and risk management strategies Critically analyses and evaluates project risks and formulate a range of strategies to effectively manage those risks Mastery of risks and risk management strategies and application to further learning

Effective communication is a key factor for managing project execution. However, project managers may face challenges as they communicate with their teams and other project stakeholders. Other factors such as developing, leading and managing project team members are also critical for successfully achieving project goals. Heldman, K. (2013). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley. • Chapter 6: Risk Planning (Read from ‘Quantifying Risk’ to ‘Summary’) • Chapter 10: Measuring and Controlling Project Performance • Chapter 11: Controlling Work Results (Read the section on ‘Monitoring and Controlling Risk’)

As project work is executed, project managers make certain that quality assurance is conducted and quality is controlled. Quality assurance consists of the activities that are undertaken to ensure that a project uses the processes needed to meet quality requirements. Meanwhile, quality control entails monitoring specific project results to determine whether they meet relevant quality standards, which have been defined with the project scope. Planning for risk management involves determining how to approach, plan and execute the various activities required for managing project risks. Because new risks may be introduced at any point in the project management life cycle, risk management is a continuous process. It begins at the project-planning phase and continues throughout the project-execution phase.