Advise ai for politics pty ltd on the likelihood

Reference no: EM133499780

Case: AI for Politics Pty Ltd' is a Sydney based Proprietary Limited company. The company created AI Elections Win ('AIEW'). AIEW is an AI tool that (i) enables candidates and political parties to analyse bigdata trends concerning voters' intentions within political campaigns; and (ii) creates chatbots, which will attempt to overcome unfavourable trends by automatically creating social media posts, digital platforms, and news content. The chatbots produce content that relates to matters of opinion and fact. Neither the chatbots nor the programmers have the capacity to verify the truth, veracity, or reliability of the contents they produce.

In a press release, the "Western Party" announced that they will use AIEW to recover the majority in the Parliament of Western Australia ('WA'). Shortly after that release, the WA Parliament passed the AI Use in Electoral Campaign Act 2023 (WA) ('Campaign Act'). Section 3 of the Act imposes a 100% tax for the selling of AIEW in WA. In that state there are only two AI development companies. Both companies have received State funding for developing AI tools to enhance democracy. Nevertheless, the development of a tool like AIEW is still far away in their plans.

AI for Politics Pty Ltd challenged the constitutionality of s 3 of the Campaign Act on one ground, namely, the violation of s 92 of the Australian Constitution.

Advise AI for Politics Pty Ltd on the likelihood that their challenge will succeed. Your advice should address:

(i) the issue raised relating to the s 92 ground for challenging the Act,

(ii) the arguments that AI for Politics Pty Ltd can raise to support their challenge,

(iii) the current law and tests that the High Court will apply (highlighting any issues that may arise in the application of the law and those tests, and whether you think they are appropriate in their current formation to address the scenario).

Reference no: EM133499780

Questions Cloud

How did this individual become a leader-for example : How would you characterize this leader's style-is? How did this individual become a leader-for example, by appointment, democratic selection, or emergence?

Advise amy electronic pty ltd on the likelihood : Advise Amy electronic pty ltd on the likelihood that their challenge will succeed - the issue raised relating to the s 92 ground for challenging the Act

Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator : Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars.

Explain importance of planning and implementing activities : Explain the importance of planning and implementing activities play and opportunities and educational programmes to meet the age stage and abilities.

Advise ai for politics pty ltd on the likelihood : Advise AI for Politics Pty Ltd on the likelihood that their challenge will succeed and the issue raised relating to the s 92 ground for challenging the Act

What could have been done better to minimize the risk : discuss what went right during the redesign and what went wrong from your perspective. Additionally, provide a discussion on what could have been done better

Explain what is being compared throughout the poem : Identify the controlling metaphor of the poem Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night. Explain what is being compared throughout the poem.

Whether debbie is inadmissible to canada : Whether Debbie is inadmissible to Canada. Be sure to include in plain language an explanation for the basis of any inadmissibility, noting relevant statutory

Discuss at least one education policy that was implemented : Discuss at least one education policy that was implemented that fits in the category of your chosen reaction and explain the impact of that policy on you

User Account

All Pages