Advantages of limiting damages in medical malpractice suits

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131915162

Question: The California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) of 1975 capped noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering at $250,000; as of this writing, the cap has never been adjusted for inflation. Such award caps have been criticized as limiting those injured from seeking legal redress, as most attorneys representing plaintiffs in medical malpractice actions work on contingency. Further, plaintiffs with permanent injuries will be able to collect no more for their pain and suffering than those who will recover fully.59 As of this writing, a campaign is underway in California to raise the MICRA cap to meet inflation, along with other measures to increase patient safety.60 To learn more about the Troy and Alanna Pack Patient Safety Act. What are the advantages and disadvantages of limiting damages in medical malpractice suits? Explain.

Reference no: EM131915162

Questions Cloud

Make an amortization schedule : Make an amortization schedule for the first 6 periods (not years) of her loan.

What objections would you raise to the ordinance : What objections would you raise to this ordinance? Do you think a parent would violate the reasonable control standard if his or her child failed to come home.

Responsibility for maintaining ethical corporate governance : Does the financial manager have a greater responsibility or a lesser responsibility for maintaining ethical corporate governance? Why or why not?

What information would you expect to be presented at trial : In 2013, Megan Thode, a former graduate student, sought $1.3 million in damages from Lehigh University for receiving a C+ in a class in which a B or above was.

Advantages of limiting damages in medical malpractice suits : The California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) of 1975 capped noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering at $250,000; as of this writing.

Should the rich be entitled to better legal representation : Should the rich be entitled to better legal representation, just as they have access to better food, better medical care, better education, and so on? Explain.

Must a criminal jury reflect the ethnic or racial diversity : Must a criminal jury reflect the ethnic or racial diversity of the community? Explain. See Powers v. Ohio, 111 S. Ct. 1364 (1991).

Spot and six-month forward rates on the norwegian krone : Suppose the spot and six-month forward rates on the Norwegian krone are Kr 5.87 and Kr 6.02, respectively.

How do you explain our increased reliance on litigation : French journalist Alain Clement offered a partial explanation for Americans' increasing reliance on lawsuits to resolve conflicts.

User Account

All Pages