Reference no: EM13996290
Assignment - Making a Moral Decision
For this assessment, you will invent a practical circumstance of your own choosing that illuminates differences among the three approaches to normative theory; a circumstance in which the duties, consequences, and virtues do not align with each other. It does not need to be a grand, controversial social issue; an everyday moral dilemma will make the conflict clearer. Just look for an example where doing your duty might cause lasting harm, or where caring about people requires breaking the rules.
Write a paper addressing this topic, supporting your statements with credible research on the three approaches to normative theory. You are also expected to conduct your own independent research into the scholarly and professional resources of the field.
Begin by describing a concrete situation that calls for someone to make an ethical decision about what to do. Choosing your example carefully will make it easier to draw an interesting contrast between the theoretical applications. Be sure to describe the situation with enough detail to provide adequate information for arriving at a responsible choice. You are welcome to choose a case in which you are personally involved, but you may find it easier to think objectively with a little detachment.
Next, think about the kinds of normative theory that could be applied to the situation you have chosen. If we are not to surrender to ethical relativism, what should guide our decision here-duties, outcomes, or virtue? You should select the approaches in a way that heightens the dilemma of deciding on a course of action that would be right or wrong. Support your presentation by considering alternative ways of applying each theory to the case. Use your example to compare and contrast the theoretical approaches in practical terms.
Finally, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these normative theories as methods for making moral decisions in practical cases. Use what you have written about the application of each theory to your example as evidence of the merits of each way of thinking about everyday choices. What makes the most sense, and how would you decide yourself? State your own position on which normative theory works best, and defend that position with clear arguments in its support.
What will be the output of the program
: what will be the output of the program?
|
How far in meters does she fall in four seconds
: The force due to air resistance is constant throughout the fall and is (0,10,0) N. How far (in meters) does she fall in 4 seconds?
|
Preparing a pro forma income statement
: What specific prices, sales volumes, market shares, per pair costs, and profit margins it will probably take to achieve the strategic and financial objectives the company's management team has set.
|
Earnings as a result of this investment?
: What pretax amounts did S&L include in its 2011 and 2012 earnings as a result of this investment?
|
Advantages and disadvantages of normative theories
: Finally, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these normative theories as methods for making moral decisions in practical cases. Use what you have written about the application of each theory to your example as evidence of the merits of eac..
|
How long does it take to increase the angular velocity
: A spool of thin wire rotates without friction about its axis. A man pulls down on the wire with force of 13.9N. How long does it take to increase the angular velocity of the spool from 13.0rad/s to 35.0rad/s?
|
What would a deontologist like immanuel kant recommend
: In explaining your position, address each of the following questions: What features of the situation are relevant for making a moral decision? What would a deontologist like Immanuel Kant recommend? What would a consequentialist like John Stuart Mill..
|
What adjusting entry is required to accomplish
: At what amount will the investment be reported in this year's balance sheet? What adjusting entry is required to accomplish this objective?
|
What is the auditor''s responsibility
: What is the auditor's responsibility if, in using the Codification, the auditor believes that an item in the financial statements should be accounted for differently under the Codification than under pre-Codification U.S. GAAP
|